You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely. I believe that they will be driven by Dojo, which Elon is going to have run Twitter so it becomes super adept at human interactions. Add an smaller, powerful starlink connector and they will never be off line!
I believe this is MasterPlan part three. Genius. What could go wrong?
(Sorry, couldn't help myself).
History is full of people who told Elon what he didn't have enough know-how to do and were as wrong as wrong could be. I suspect you will be in good (bad) company.Given that Elon often personally creates Twitter rants, I don't think he and his "free speech absolutism" are the right leader in the space.
Free speech absolutism gives you 4Chan which no sane advertiser or brand wants to be associated with. And if he's not actually about absolute free speech then firstly he's lying, and secondly he's right back in the job of regulating reasonable free speech which is hard, and nuanced, and not well suited to his talents which are about science.
Twitter is a massive distraction, and a bad idea, in that order, from the perspective of Tesla investors.
Given Dojo was developed by Elon under Tesla, I don't think he's free to just hand that technology over to another private company, even one he happens to also own. Yes, he might try to arrange a sweet licensing deal and/or cross polinate the basic design but that's fraught with conflict-of-interest concerns between a publicly held Tesla and a future-private Twitter...
This kind of public/private conflict of interest is yet another reason to be against the Twitter adventure
History is full of people who told Elon what he didn't have enough know-how to do and were as wrong as wrong could be. I suspect you will be in good (bad) company.
Elon doesn't know how to manufacture cars. He doesn't know how to do it in volume. He doesn't know what kind of cars people want. Auto manufacturers understand their customers in a way that Elon cannot. No one has grown production of large complex products at 50% per year for years running. It's impossible.
Elon cannot land rockets. Even NASA can't land rockets and they have over half a century of know-how.
Elon can't reform Twitter because he doesn't understand the nuances of language. Free speech is a complex topic that Elon has no expertise in. Twitter has learned a thing or two as they became one of the most popular social networks to ever be devised. Elon cannot be effective here, he is out of his league.
Any questions?
Um, no. You are over-looking that Tesla operates in different markets from Twitter. They don't compete with one another and a license deal for AI technology would be mutually beneficial to both companies in a huge way. It feels like you are trying to take the very strengths and synergies of the incredible base of knowledge and know-how within Musk companies and trying to present it as if it's a liability.
Tesla and SpaceX regularly help each other out, Tesla provides electric motors and controllers for use in rocket thruster gimbals and SpaceX provides metallurgical expertise for Tesla's manufacturing operations. That is just the tip of the iceberg of things these companies bill each other for. It's mutually beneficial.
What you are claiming has no basis in the real world, a world where companies routinely work with one another to leverage their individual strengths. There are no losers in these types of technology transfers.
This is about synergy in the truest sense of the word (rather than intellectual property or other transfers in the narrow legal sense)Name one example where there is a CEO of a public company handing intellectual property from the public company to another independent private venture that's owned and run by the same CEO?
This is about synergy in the truest sense of the word (rather than intellectual property or other transfers in the narrow legal sense)
I might be imagining it, but wasn't there mention during a conference call or AI day or something about eventually selling runtime on Dojo to other companies to run AI tasks? They wouldn't be selling the hardware, just time on it. You would buy time on it much like any other cloud service.
There would be no handing over of key technology, rather, an established pricing model for anyone to buy time, and Twitter could buy time.
What payroll? The salary of the Technoking is $0 per year.Step back even further - what public company would authorize their CEO to go run another new adventure and stay on the payroll?
From personal observation I'd have expected Polestar to have greater representation. Ditto Tesla to be honest.
27 days from April 19 to May 15 @ 1200/day plus 46 days from May 16 to EOQ @ 2600/day would put total production from Shanghai for Q2 at 152,000.Tesla targets pre-lockdown output in Shanghai by mid-May
Tesla Inc is aiming to increase output at its Shanghai plant to 2,600 cars a day from May 16, it said in an internal memo seen by Reuters, as it seeks to restore production to levels before the city locked down to control COVID-19.www.reuters.com
“Tesla is aiming to run two shifts at its Shanghai plant from May 16, an internal memo seen by Reuters said, which would enable the U.S. carmarker to bring factory output back to levels before the city's lockdown.
The U.S. carmaker plans to churn out 2,600 electric cars from the Shanghai plant per day from then, the memo showed.”
What payroll? The salary of the Technoking is $0 per year.
Tesla targets pre-lockdown output in Shanghai by mid-May
Tesla Inc is aiming to increase output at its Shanghai plant to 2,600 cars a day from May 16, it said in an internal memo seen by Reuters, as it seeks to restore production to levels before the city locked down to control COVID-19.www.reuters.com
“Tesla is aiming to run two shifts at its Shanghai plant from May 16, an internal memo seen by Reuters said, which would enable the U.S. carmarker to bring factory output back to levels before the city's lockdown.
The U.S. carmaker plans to churn out 2,600 electric cars from the Shanghai plant per day from then, the memo showed.”
27 days from April 19 to May 15
Thanks for the sarcasm, I needed that with my morning coffee.I'm sorry - you are of course correct. Elon is not a Tesla employee. He is not an officer of the company. He receives no compensation of any kind and has not duties at the company. No stock options, no healthcare benefits, no paid expenses, no free travel, absolutely no involvement with Tesla. My bad.
You already had an example. Tesla and SpaceX.I'm not saying Dojo might not be a good tool for Twitter. I'm saying Tesla is a public company and it's CEO does have legal and feduciary duty to represent the best interest of Teslas shareholders even if it would be convenient to hand over key technology to the CEO's private side venture.
I'll ask again based on the earlier posters assertion that this is totally normal. Give ONE example. CEO of public company signs license agreement to hand over key technology to a private venture that he just so happens to also own and operate for his own personal gain.
History is full of people who told Elon what he didn't have enough know-how to do and were as wrong as wrong could be. I suspect you will be in good (bad) company.
Elon doesn't know how to manufacture cars. He doesn't know how to do it in volume. He doesn't know what kind of cars people want. Auto manufacturers understand their customers in a way that Elon cannot. No one has grown production of large complex products at 50% per year for years running. It's impossible.
Elon cannot land rockets. Even NASA can't land rockets and they have over half a century of know-how.
Elon can't reform Twitter because he doesn't understand the nuances of language. Free speech is a complex topic that Elon has no expertise in. Twitter has learned a thing or two as they became one of the most popular social networks to ever be devised. Elon cannot be effective here, he is out of his league.
Any questions?