Plug in on the opposite sideDemonstrating one of the big frustrations we're going to encounter as companies with other brands of cars start using Superchargers.
Anyone spot it?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Plug in on the opposite sideDemonstrating one of the big frustrations we're going to encounter as companies with other brands of cars start using Superchargers.
Anyone spot it?
2 min to connect?
Charging cable short?
60 cents per kWh?
@wipster saw it.Plug in on the opposite side
It’s special because you and your ilk were screaming demand problem just a few weeks ago. And the month before that. And the year before that. And last decade.So delivery time has increased to over six weeks? What is so special about that? Electrek pumping the stock.
It's a great idea. IPO the electric side of the business, it can be 80% Ford owned initially. The IPO could help them raise funds for Capex. Model E gets some parts and supplies from Ford Blue initially and benefits from their existing infrastructure and contracts.Spoke to a Ford person today. He said he thinks they'll split the company and the shares. ICE can still be very profitable "without the EV side, the ICE stock could actually go up for a while."
O
M
G
Anyone want to time that one?
Nope. But I guess you are the one that swallow every word from Musk as the truth... The 20 million guys. Lol.It’s special because you and your ilk were screaming demand problem just a few weeks ago. And the month before that. And the year before that. And last decade.
MeowNope. But I guess you are the one that swallow every word from Musk as the truth... The 20 million guys. Lol.
I guess everyone from Norway here can remember when the E-tron came.. Lots of arrogant e-tron buyers claiming that charging cables were too short. Because e-tron has the charge opening almost by the mirror, against the middle of the car. So all charging stations where you either back in, or go with the front in, here most cables were too short for that car.. Im not gonna say they were not bullied by us, because they were...@wipster saw it.
The BMW is plugged in on the wrong side so it effectively takes up 2 stalls on a normal Supercharger. The Rivian is wrong ended too. There are 4 corners and 4 sides to choose from. Tesla stalls work well with 2 of the corners and 2 of the sides... companies with cars on the driver's front, the passenger rear, or in the middle of the sides of the car just won't work well.
That's the only way they can move away from dealerships. Even then it'd be a struggleSpoke to a Ford person today. He said he thinks they'll split the company and the shares. ICE can still be very profitable "without the EV side, the ICE stock could actually go up for a while."
O
M
G
Anyone want to time that one?
They will never invest in Tesla too bad.
I would love to track a whole variety of metrics regarding the Supercharger network and the fleet, and how the two interact.This is a tad myopic because you are focusing only on stalls per fleet size, but the most important metric, should be charge time per car. By moving to V2 and then V3, and more efficient cars with smaller pack sizes (i.e. 3/Y) you don't have to grow the supercharger network at the same pace because you make up for some of it with faster turnover per stall.
Our 2013 Model S P85s used to take about an hour to go from 10% to 80% state of charge.
Same jump in state of charge our 3 or Y is more like 30-35 minutes.
This would IMHO be a way of Ford deleting debt and liabilities.It's a great idea. IPO the electric side of the business, it can be 80% Ford owned initially. The IPO could help them raise funds for Capex. Model E gets some parts and supplies from Ford Blue initially and benefits from their existing infrastructure and contracts.
The ICE side might be more profitable at first... then the reverse will be true (hopefully).
Flip side here (South Africa)I guess everyone from Norway here can remember when the E-tron came.. Lots of arrogant e-tron buyers claiming that charging cables were too short. Because e-tron has the charge opening almost by the mirror, against the middle of the car. So all charging stations where you either back in, or go with the front in, here most cables were too short for that car.. Im not gonna say they were not bullied by us, because they were...
They argued the whole time that it wasnt Audis fault. We said maybe Audi forgot to check what is the most standard charging station setup. I dont know if there was an end to that discussion, I dont remember any charging cables being switched to longer ones.
I had to correct that slide and deleted the tweet but published it in my latest video but the overall statement remains the same. It's been a stupid calculation error on my side however for Volkswagen we have right now just a few hundred dollars in average profits per vehicle sold and that may even go down in the future.Great tweet by @avoigt :
Background given by Alex:
- Based on official VW Group and Tesla released data;
- The chart includes the total and officially announced units sold by VW Group and Tesla;
- Includes VW Group ICE units sold.
VW Group has a very difficult, if not impossible, task ahead to change quickly enough in order not to completely "go Kodak".
The fact that it is Ford planning this and not GM or VW or Toyota speaks to who is actually taking Tesla and EVs seriously . Said it and say it again Ford is impressive- the only OEM that I can find has announced or is building battery capacity to transition. They have done so very quickly. Deal with CATL was a brilliant bit of deal making it seems to me. They need to improve the guts of the EV but they at least seem to have a plan.This would IMHO be a way of Ford deleting debt and liabilities.
on splitting shares, it could be arranged so that the ICE company would carry the debt, old factories and the majority of the employees, with the new EV business relatively debt free. EV company will then hold most of the IP, brand and patents, much of which would then be licensed back to the ICE company (sucking more money out of the old ICE business)
The ICE business would then become unprofitable over time and ultimately go into bankruptcy, taking with it its debts, the unprofitable factories, and the costs of laying off staff - leaving the EV business clean and debt free and holding the valuable assets.
Should there be a share split, look to see who owns the debt, brand and the IP. This will tell the true story of what's really going on.
In regards for how the whole billing and stuff would take place, my bet is on the QR code for each stall.
Remember when Elon said "Copy WeChat"? And Twitter has recently filed application to become a payment processor?
For those unfamiliar with the whole WeChat/AliPay that pretty much accounts for 99.9% of daily transactions now in China if I were there, the merchant would have a QR code that you scan or sometimes you'd open your app to pay, it generates a QR code for them to scan, and you submit the payment. Everything is integrated on the backend to handle everything. In fact, when you get paid (say from F&F or just selling something) in WeChat/AliPay, the money don't actually go into your bank account or whatever. It just sits there like PayPal balance.
So, this is one of the ways, that I think from a 4D chess that Elon is playing's perspective it's going to go down.
Tesla payment will also grow from there. I believe the day that you need to pull out your card/phone to pay at a drive-through will be behind us very soon. The car itself will handle everything.
Perhaps Tesla will go to the "You get what the other car doesn't use" algorithm.They are only going to open select Supercharger sites. i.e. ones that have low utilization. Most likely only V3 sites.
Also, you won't be sharing chargers with a Leaf, as they can't use CCS, and Tesla isn't going to be supporting CHAdeMO. Now sharing with a Bolt will be bad, they charge so slow...
It would be, but I guess they will go for "the site being down", so if there is one working charger (even if it's not at the full charging rate, it's not down. Stupid way to do it, but that's my guess. I don't have a lot of confidence in them doing the right thing.97% uptime would mean they can only be down 263 hours a year (24 x 365 x 0.03), or less than an hour a day. I assume that means individual stalls must be at 97%. 97% uptime isn't that impressive, but considering that right now it seems they are at 97% downtime, it is a big improvement
Ah, good old Schrödinger's charger.See according to EA, the chargers are online. It says so on the screen and from the app. It's only offline once you plug it in, so if you don't plug it in, it'll be online.
Spoke to a Ford person today. He said he thinks they'll split the company and the shares. ICE can still be very profitable "without the EV side, the ICE stock could actually go up for a while."
O
M
G
Anyone want to time that one?
I guess general coverage has been (and should be) part of the discussions, so I would expect a few stalls across many (if not most) sites to be modified/supplemented and opened up?Perhaps Tesla will go to the "You get what the other car doesn't use" algorithm.