That video needs a NSFW(or before/near meals) warning.Youtube video of people trying surstromming
I don't even know what you guys are betting on but I'd like to suggest Surströmming for the loser.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That video needs a NSFW(or before/near meals) warning.Youtube video of people trying surstromming
I don't even know what you guys are betting on but I'd like to suggest Surströmming for the loser.
Youtube video of people trying surstromming
I don't even know what you guys are betting on but I'd like to suggest Surströmming for the loser.
Eddie a lot of people up voted your post so let me address the confusion you have started here.I know I’ve seen Superchargers that charge an increasing rate per kWh as you approach full. I think in the car if you click on a Supercharger it will show you if a tiered rate is in effect.
In fact, here’s the nearest one to me, albeit in minutes rather than kWh:
I wonder if Tesla would increase the cost to charge from 90% to 100% as it takes the longest even with our Teslas.
I know I’ve seen Superchargers that charge an increasing rate per kWh as you approach full.
I don't know if Tesla can adjust their simulated training data to account for some of these differences.While it's true that Tesla has multiple iterations of (different) hardware they support, I'm positive each requires specific tuning and configuration of the system.
For instance, just in cameras/imaging sensors, you have different characteristics such as:
-Sensitivity
-Resolution
-Bayer-pattern implementation
-Chroma filter wavelengths
-Noise envelope
-Fixed patter noise
-Saturation behavior
-Gamma response
-Aspect ratio
-Field angle
-Temperature sensitivity
-Tolerances
-etc....
And then there's placement around the vehicle (no 2 models are same size/shape), height, angle, windshield rake, etc...
Repeat for each discrete FSD component, and you have a multitude of parameters to account for. It's certainly possible to "generalize" the system such that other components can be used in a different vehicle implementation, but there's a large amount of work to do so, especially for a safety-critical system.
We humans don't have our eyes in the exactly same position in two different cars either. Yet we can drive different cars reasonably well. Our brain somehow figures out some approximation of where the car is and how the environment around it looks like. An artificial neural network can do the same. Give it a few million videos from a few hundred thousands of cars, autolabel the videos correctly and train the neural network to output where everything is and it will learn to do the camera calibration or whatever helps it solve the problem most efficiently...I don't know if Tesla can adjust their simulated training data to account for some of these differences.
The software could build up a 3D image map in a common format, for all models, regardless of the differences?
If there is a smart way to allow for this, I'm sure they have found it..
Seems perfectly normal when written by human person reporters.Not to mention "electric vehicle car" is a really stupid thing to write.
Eddie a lot of people up voted your post so let me address the confusion you have started here….
The tiers here aren't increasing cost as the battery approaches full, they are just trying to use tiers to approximate a per kWh cost in a state that doesn't allow them to price it per kWh.
Easy to do, I also read it wrong when I first saw it. The units of measurements aren’t intuitive for non-EE types like me, so I think of it as: kW = how fast electricity flows, kWh is storage (capacity or how “full” your car battery is).Thank you for the clarification. I was, apparently, interpreting it wrong.
Seems perfectly normal when written by human person reporters.
I've been holding and buying since 2017 and will continue to hold till I die and my children get the stockAs a HODLer, algos mean little to me. I'm in for the long haul.
I used to give out what I referred to as "Tesla Twenties" to street musicians. Now they have to be satisfied with ten.I've been holding and buying since 2017 and will continue to hold till I die and my children get the stock
I agree the day-to-day price doesn't matter in the long run, but when Tesla was over $400 I tipped a lot better...
As the training data attempts to portray "actual" events, I think it more likely that in order to generalize FSD to the point that it can be implemented by other manufacturers using other/new hardware sensors, Tesla would have to specify the needed parameters for a device (minimum camera resolution, FOV, etc...) as well as a method to supply a profile the devices for FSD to ingest. Once that happens a calibration process for the FSD system for that specific model implmentation....I don't know if Tesla can adjust their simulated training data to account for some of these differences.
The software could build up a 3D image map in a common format, for all models, regardless of the differences?
If there is a smart way to allow for this, I'm sure they have found it..
I don’t see why any manufacturer would want that, let alone Tesla. Imagine licensing iOS for a Samsung made phone. You couldn’t use any differentiating features on the Samsung and you run the risk that something in iOS doesn’t work right. In a car, that could very well be dangerous. There is really no incentive for Tesla to license what they consider the eventual sole value of the company.As the training data attempts to portray "actual" events, I think it more likely that in order to generalize FSD to the point that it can be implemented by other manufacturers using other/new hardware sensors, Tesla would have to specify the needed parameters for a device (minimum camera resolution, FOV, etc...) as well as a method to supply a profile the devices for FSD to ingest. Once that happens a calibration process for the FSD system for that specific model implmentation....
I don’t see why any manufacturer would want that, let alone Tesla. Imagine licensing iOS for a Samsung made phone. You couldn’t use any differentiating features on the Samsung and you run the risk that something in iOS doesn’t work right. In a car, that could very well be dangerous. There is really no incentive for Tesla to license what they consider the eventual sole value of the company.
The idea of Tesla licensing their FSD tech has been hypothesized many times here. My question is, is it practical? (I don't have the technical knowledge to have an informed opinion on the subject.) So, I'm asking the bored (SIC) whether it's feasible or not.
They can use whatever camera supplier they want, brakes, drive train, batteries can all vary.
Just with Tesla, FSD is already working with dozens of different battery pack and dozens of different motor configurations (hundreds of combinations of those). Doesn't really matter to FSD.