Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I was confused by this ruling as shareholders approved the package and how come all the failed CEOs who get huge payments haven’t been stopped ?

Then I saw the bit about the independence of the board and I accept the board is not as independent as I would like but does this mean new board members are needed before any other payments are approved?

Also this ruling creates a paradox where many companies mess up but an independent board can create reward packages for themselves, the board members get huge payments even though the company has huge disasters ( for example the banks during the financial crisis and Boeing recently)
 
I was confused by this ruling as shareholders approved the package and how come all the failed CEOs who get huge payments haven’t been stopped ?
Again, the shareholder vote was essentially voided because the board failed to give us complete, and accurate, information, preventing the shareholders from making an informed decision.
 
Yeah I'm aware of the lawsuit, but on what grounds does a Delaware judge have the power to null a business compensation agreement? Like why did the judge feel it was "unfair", for what reason?

This was an extreme, likely activist, position taken by this particular judge, for two reasons:
  1. the Burden of Proof is NEVER on the Defendant, ALWAYS on the Plaintiff (this is so basic a mistake as to be staggeringly wrong in legal terms), and
  2. the "Fairness" of the CEO Comp plan was voted upon, and settled, by the shareholders on March 31, 2018. If the Majority felt it was a unfair plan, the plan would not have been adopted by a vote of Shareholders.
This judge likely knew all this, and did it anyway simply because it will take 7+ years in appeal to get this farcical ruling undone. Elon's share options expire in less than 4 years (Jan 20, 2028), requiring a replacement Comp. plan by practical necessity. Then more court cases...

Here's the problem going forward for any new Comp plan: Would Elon trust that he won't get the 'Delaware Rug-pull' again after he's done all the hard work? I sure wouldn't, and sadly would vote against such a plan. Pay the man some cash, BoD! You got lots.
 
Maybe it’s time for Robyn or Tesla board to release a statement
Announce a new comp plan, give bonuses for prior years and put it to shareholder vote asap
One can wish…
Well surely even though the Board was expecting that the judge would find that the pay package was valid, they had to have a plan in mind in case it was not. And quite possibly Elon's recent statement(s) about 25% voting control were meant to anticipate this ruling, thus freeing the board to develop a pay package that focuses not just on pay but perhaps more importantly Elon's desire to control Tesla's AI and robotics programs going forward.

As such, I agree with the statement above that this particular ruling will not be appealed. This, from a capitalist perspective, is disappointing since the ruling opens the door to future attempts to make corporate and shareholder decisions subject to judicial overview (scary)! While corporations do in a sense resemble the way our government is put together with a legislative and executive aspects (i.e. Board and CEO), they don't have a judicial branch since they don't have a constitution per se... the Board handles many of those responsibilities by attempting to ensure the Mission isn't violated.

But from a Tesla perspective it may enable the Board to do what I stated above with a new package that addresses Elon's concerns and definitely quicker than if this ruling is appealed. Gonna be a wild month I think...

When is Elon's coming address to Tesla supposed to happen? Early February? Can't come soon enough.
 
Last edited:
Again, the shareholder vote was essentially voided because the board failed to give us complete, and accurate, information, preventing the shareholders from making an informed decision.
I see, seems to me the judge has voided it on a technicality.
Elon and the board should acknowledge they need to be more competent to meet legal requirements.
 
This was an extreme, likely activist, position taken by this particular judge, for two reasons:
  1. the Burden of Proof is NEVER on the Defendant, ALWAYS on the Plaintiff (this is so basic a mistake as to be staggeringly wrong in legal terms), and
  2. the "Fairness" of the CEO Comp plan was voted upon, and settled, by the shareholders on March 31, 2018. If the Majority felt it was a unfair plan, the plan would not have been adopted by a vote of Shareholders.
This judge likely knew all this, and did it anyway simply because it will take 7+ years in appeal to get this farcical ruling undone. Elon's share options expire in less than 4 years (Jan 20, 2028), requiring a replacement Comp. plan by practical necessity. Then more court cases...

Here's the problem going forward for any new Comp plan: Would Elon trust that he won't get the 'Delaware Rug-pull' again after he's done all the hard work? I sure wouldn't, and sadly would vote against such a plan. Pay the man some cash, BoD! You got lots.

Appeals go directly to the Delaware Supreme Court. On average, a ruling is made in 30 days.
 
Again, the shareholder vote was essentially voided because the board failed to give us complete, and accurate, information, preventing the shareholders from making an informed decision.

Can someone expand on this? Here's my thought process on this:

1) The court claims Elon had too much control over his own compensation, board wasn't independent enough, the process for devising the compensation plan wasn't transparent, etc.

2) But do the shareholders really need to know the minutia of the process in order to vote on the compensation plan at face value?

3) The shareholders were voting on fairness of the compensation plan itself, not the details of how it was devised. It's like if you were deciding whether to buy a car, and all the details of the car were presented accurately, but you have no idea how the final price was determined. You don't need to know how the price was determined, you just need to decide whether you like the price or not.

4) I don't see anything deceptive about the actual compensation plan at its face value. The details of the plan itself wasn't hiding anything from the shareholders.