Got it, you don't have any. For those not wanting to search for the post here is the important part:
Note this was a repost in late December, of something
posted in early December, from a December 6th article/press release, shortly after the Hydro sympathy action started. How can you say that it is doubtly that the "
would be able to go through with redundancies" when they clearly stated that they had already received permission to go through with them? So, clearly they could go through with them.
But as the sympathy action didn't end quickly, about a month after it started, we have had reports that they did in fact end up letting employees go:
Translation of the important portion:
Imagine that. You have ~20 people dedicated to fulfilling one contract, and that contract goes away and you end up having to let them go. Doesn't seem like a surprise. (I suppose there was the possibility that they could find other contracts to fulfill that capacity, but it seems like they were not able to.)