2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
Enrich the discussion? Why do you suppose you have earned an agreement for your nonsense?
It is unclear to me what you are asking. Please clarify and I'll do my best to provide an answer.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Enrich the discussion? Why do you suppose you have earned an agreement for your nonsense?
Fear. Anger. Illogic.Sure, really, how does a union dare to have a war chest that enables them to stand up to the employers? Better for the employers to have another billion.
Obviously there is a culture gap here.
From a European perspective working conditions in the US are crap. Vacation time, sick days, health insurance, employment safety, maternity leave, are all completely substandard by the standards of most industrial countries.
The wealth disparity in the US is obscene, but this is all supposedly compensated by a tiny number of employees who strike gold because they have received shares at the right time (that doesn't apply to the Swedish employees anyway). Whatever, you may fo in the US whatever you like, just don't try to export that culture to Europe.
Finally, just stop trying to sell "pedo guy" bully and chum of China's internet censor Musk as some kind of benefactor of humanity.
All I saw is that they might stop transporting Teslas that are headed to Sweden. I haven't heard anything about them stopping the serving of Teslas, or interfering with Teslas staying in Norway.You guys will never convince each other. Imo leave it. Meanwhile, Norway which has so many Teslas has joined the strike:
If they stop servicing tesla cars in Norway it's a lot bigger deal than Sweden. Or is it just a sympathy strike against Tesla Motors Sweden unloading cars in Norway and taking them to Sweden? It seems a bit unclear, but could be a big deal. Waiting for details...
Imo the language that they use seems to hint that they might escalate even further. Maybe initially they will attack only transports to Sweden, but they have the full support and it's a pretty big union...All I saw is that they might stop transporting Teslas that are headed to Sweden. I haven't heard anything about them stopping the serving of Teslas, or interfering with Teslas staying in Norway.
You guys will never convince each other. Imo leave it. Meanwhile, Norway which has so many Teslas has joined the strike:
I don't support the Union. But the reasons have been argued here before and repeating the debate is not adding any value. Anyway, to steelman their position. They believe that without collective agreement, the workers will not be treated as well by the employer. They can get fired(like spotify recently fired 1500 people to improve their economic performance) more easily, they will get less pension(Tesla claims stock options is more valuable but some people think stocks are gambling) and they think you should do it in solidarity otherwise other companies who are less nice than Tesla will more easily get away with mistreating their workers.I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. There isn't enough information provided to have an informed opinion.
I'm trying to understand what IF Metall is so stirred up about. It doesn't seem to be about working conditions or pay or any actual issue with Tesla that can be clearly stated. (other than the "if Tesla does it, everyone else might do it too" offering by IF Metall)
Are they only upset because a company won't enter into an agreement that is not required by law? This is basic rights stuff. Contracts cannot be coerced and remain valid.
This, now international, fiasco must be about solving some actual problem. What prevents IF Metall, or any of their advocates, from breaking this down into component parts so it can be understood by all?
Or, is the problem being solved by this attack merely a matter of IF Metall claiming their turf, regardless of the law, and disregarding rights violations they employ to get their way?
How does entering into the agreement make it better for the company, the employees, or for IF Metall than if they do not enter into it?
What are the specific incentives for each of those groups to have a collective agreement?
If those in a position to know could answer these queries (in a civil manner) understanding is bound to follow.
When those in a position to know continue to avoid answering these questions, it raises the question of, "What is so important that it must be concealed by IF Metall to avoid a clear understanding being revealed."
Shouldn't the amount of pension just depend on your salary and how much of it goes towards your pension fund?I don't support the Union. But the reasons have been argued here before and repeating the debate is not adding any value. Anyway, to steelman their position. They believe that without collective agreement, the workers will not be treated as well by the employer. They can get fired(like spotify recently fired 1500 people to improve their economic performance) more easily, they will get less pension(Tesla claims stock options is more valuable but some people think stocks are gambling) and they think you should do it in solidarity otherwise other companies who are less nice than Tesla will more easily get away with mistreating their workers.
Imo they fail to see the cost of the bureaucracy, the slower decision making, the corruption in the unions(Fora in this case) and the mob rule that use. Most of them are midwits and socialists and they hate Elon and just want to stick it to him even if they cause more losses than anything they might win if they manage to win.
for everyone then as we watch this international drama unfold!
Who doesn't love a story where the bully gets their just desserts in the end?
Sure, really, how does a union dare to have a war chest that enables them to stand up to the employers? Better for the employers to have another billion.
Obviously there is a culture gap here.
From a European perspective working conditions in the US are crap. Vacation time, sick days, health insurance, employment safety, maternity leave, are all completely substandard by the standards of most industrial countries.
The wealth disparity in the US is obscene, but this is all supposedly compensated by a tiny number of employees who strike gold because they have received shares at the right time (that doesn't apply to the Swedish employees anyway). Whatever, you may fo in the US whatever you like, just don't try to export that culture to Europe.
Finally, just stop trying to sell "pedo guy" bully and chum of China's internet censor Musk as some kind of benefactor of humanity.
right there with ya buddy, bully musk is finally going to get whats long coming to him. what i think is funniest, is the alternate reality that people live in where they don't quite recognize the giant public perception shift that's happened with musk and still view him as some tony musk ironing man, and not as the weird faced bloated grandma whose stumbling from one public **** up to another, that the rest of us see.
You guys will never convince each other. Imo leave it. Meanwhile, Norway which has so many Teslas has joined the strike:
If they stop servicing tesla cars in Norway it's a lot bigger deal than Sweden. Or is it just a sympathy strike against Tesla Motors Sweden unloading cars in Norway and taking them to Sweden? It seems a bit unclear, but could be a big deal. Waiting for details...
The strike is about Tesla Motors (global) refusing Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any collective agreements. Tesla Motors Sweden does not have the mandate to sign any collective agreement. The only way the IF Metal Union can convince Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any agreement is by harming/threatening to cause harm to Tesla Motors (global).Hmm. Tesla Norway and Sweden are different companies. The main strike is against Tesla Sweden, I don't think sympathy strike can suddenly target Tesla Norway instead?
What's more, Norway has very different union system than Sweden. I don't believe Tesla has any issues with that system.
Looks like someone created a second account to support their positionright there with ya buddy, bully musk is finally going to get whats long coming to him. what i think is funniest, is the alternate reality that people live in where they don't quite recognize the giant public perception shift that's happened with musk and still view him as some tony musk ironing man, and not as the weird faced bloated grandma whose stumbling from one public **** up to another, that the rest of us see.
right there with ya buddy, bully musk is finally going to get whats long coming to him. what i think is funniest, is the alternate reality that people live in where they don't quite recognize the giant public perception shift that's happened with musk and still view him as some tony musk ironing man, and not as the weird faced bloated grandma whose stumbling from one public **** up to another, that the rest of us see.
The strike is about Tesla Motors (global) refusing Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any collective agreements. Tesla Motors Sweden does not have the mandate to sign any collective agreement. The only way the IF Metal Union can convince Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any agreement is by harming/threatening to cause harm to Tesla Motors (global).
Does Tesla Motors Norway have collective agreements?
The strike is about Tesla Motors (global) refusing Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any collective agreements. Tesla Motors Sweden does not have the mandate to sign any collective agreement. The only way the IF Metal Union can convince Tesla Motors Sweden to sign any agreement is by harming/threatening to cause harm to Tesla Motors (global).
Does Tesla Motors Norway have collective agreements?
Oh. I somehow didn't think IF Metall could legally target companies outside Sweden. But yeah it makes sense.
Tesla Norway most likely doesn't have collective agreement. At least it has been mentioned several times that Tesla doesn't have such agreements in any country.
However.. Remember we have "binding agreement" in Finland. Or whatever is called, "yleissitovuus". It basically means that collective agreement automatically applies to all companies in that genre. So in Finland Tesla hasn't made a contract, but they have to follow it anyway. But as noted Tesla terms are better than what's required by a big margin.
I googled and it seems Norway system is something between Finland and Sweden. Agreements are not binding by default, but if a company is found to pay too less or having cheaper foreign workers or some other annoyance, binding agreement can be forced.. So it's probably the government that takes care of mishaps, instead of the union.
Some Norwegian can correct me if I got it all wrong.