What I am saying is that Tesla has large purchase agreements, notably with Panasonic that bind Tesla to take up a number of cells (and pay for it) that they then need to warehouse because Model 3 and Tesla Energy production are both bottlenecked at the moment. These purchase agreements as reported are $2.7B for 2018 with over 90% from Panasonic. At $100 per kWh that's 27 GWh Tesla must buy this year. Guidance is 1 GWh of Tesla Energy product, leaving us with 26GWh of cells that Tesla is contractually bound to purchase. 9 for the S/X makes 17GWh for the Model 3 or enough for over 225 000 LR Model 3s. That's a number Tesla is almost guaranteed to miss. So will Panasonic let them off the hook, if they don't buy that many cells. Or will they buy them, pay for them and see cash being converted in inventory. So how you see that story unfold is very relevant in trying to determine Teslas cash position over this year.
I'll quote myself from the general thread earlier today (post #5184), bolding added for the key part in response to your comment.
"Matt, be careful, there are many people out there pumping out misinformation about Tesla at 100 mph at the top of their lungs. It looks like you have been duped by some of this misinformation.
Tesla is not facing a liquidity crisis. They entered 2018 with about $3.4 billion in cash. Low Model 3 production in Q1 may mean this dips to about $2.4 billion, but, Q2 is likely when the tide turns, if not, then Q3. Their next big amount of debt coming due is in March... of 2019! about $300 million will come due before then, but on the scale of $2-3 billion cash on hand, that is not a big deal.
Just didn't want to see anyone duped by misinformation. MattEnth, key is that we all learn to think for ourselves, I'm sure you can do better than you ever imagined doing that! Really mean that!"