You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what are people's thoughts on wider deployment?
Im a new Tesla owner so trying to understand all this.
From what I understand the standard AP/EAP/FSD uses one set of instructions motorway driving, and a different set of instructions for FSD when driving around towns/smaller roads.
This planned update is to remove the set of instructions that currently is used on motorway autopilot/EAP/FSD, and replace it with the same instructions used for normal FSD, which is supposedly better?
So AP/EAP/FSD will all use the same set of instructions, everywhere, whenever in use?
Ty
That's the planner, not the vision stackNeeds to lose right turn on red for a start!
Yes and no.So AP/EAP/FSD will all use the same set of instructions, everywhere, whenever in use?
Phantom braking for sureI wonder what features we take for granted on EAP legacy stack will disappear on single stack with the promise of them « returning soon »
From what I understand the standard AP/EAP/FSD uses one set of instructions motorway driving, and a different set of instructions for FSD when driving around towns/smaller roads.
This only applies to the FSD Beta (in America). its possible that Tesla will use it for AP / EAP at some point in the future ... or they may just let AP / EAP wither on the vine. I can't see how they can port the single stack FSD code to AP / EAP and for the owners to not just use it everywhere ... in which case they would get a very heavily discounted FSD . Tesla could make AP EAP (i.e. using FSD single-stack code) only work on Motorways, but right now AP/EAP will work anywhere (where there are half decent road markings) - not suggesting you should use it on minor roads, but it will work up to a point.So AP/EAP/FSD will all use the same set of instructions, everywhere, whenever in use?
The single stack is the image processing and position location, the planner plans the moves and routingOthers have explained it, this may thus be superfluous
Only FSD has the "City driving" instructions, and that is only available in America (maybe Canada, not sure). Previously using the Beta of FSD when the car went from "City Streets" onto "Motorway/Highway" then it reverted to the original AP/EAP code.
The single stack is the milestone where the original Motorway instructions (as used by AP/EAP) are being removed and replaced by the new FSD code - i.e. the earlier FSD beta had two separate "stacks" of instructions now replaced by a single-stack.
This only applies to the FSD Beta (in America). its possible that Tesla will use it for AP / EAP at some point in the future ... or they may just let AP / EAP wither on the vine. I can't see how they can port the single stack FSD code to AP / EAP and for the owners to not just use it everywhere ... in which case they would get a very heavily discounted FSD . Tesla could make AP EAP (i.e. using FSD single-stack code) only work on Motorways, but right now AP/EAP will work anywhere (where there are half decent road markings) - not suggesting you should use it on minor roads, but it will work up to a point.
So if Tesla roll out FSD, in some form, to AP / EAP owners (and at some unspecified!! future date) what would they leave out? I suppose they could have AP do only "Stay in lane" (and TACC) and EAP do that plus "Lane change to pass" and NoA (and park and summon ...) so just leave off stopping at / handling junctions.
That's why it's called the single stackThey would need to enable it for use anywhere for parking on streets too for the summon / auto park of EAP to work too
The single stack is rolling out to the FSDb users in the USA, so needs some iterations before going to the stable channelI guess the challenge with the move is speed. City streets speeds are relatively slow, say under 40mph, maybe even 30, I can’t recall seeing many fast moving cars. Scale that to motorway speeds and everything is moving much more quickly, or another way of saying it is the difference between where something was and where it now is on the next refresh cycle will be greater which makes the whole job harder.
I imagine they may go back to limiting the max speed again when they do release it as a result, so maybe we’d prefer them not to bring it out until they can handle higher speeds.
This only applies to the FSD Beta (in America). its possible that Tesla will use it for AP / EAP at some point in the future ... or they may just let AP / EAP wither on the vine. I can't see how they can port the single stack FSD code to AP / EAP and for the owners to not just use it everywhere ... in which case they would get a very heavily discounted FSD . Tesla could make AP EAP (i.e. using FSD single-stack code) only work on Motorways, but right now AP/EAP will work anywhere (where there are half decent road markings) - not suggesting you should use it on minor roads, but it will work up to a point.
So if Tesla roll out FSD, in some form, to AP / EAP owners (and at some unspecified!! future date) what would they leave out? I suppose they could have AP do only "Stay in lane" (and TACC) and EAP do that plus "Lane change to pass" and NoA (and park and summon ...) so just leave off stopping at / handling junctions.
just FYI: Lane keeping assistant was the first thing I turned off on my G20 BMW 330e.I went looking for some videos of the BMW system because I don't really know what the standard of the other auto manufacturers' 'Autopilot' systems is. Anyway, this is the first result I got that isn't a puff piece about an upcoming L3 system:
View attachment 916027
Clearly not everyone thinks it's flawless.. Some of those results are quite old though so maybe that's out of date (still top on Google though).
What's the name of the current/best (but actually available) BMW system? I am genuinely interested to see Autopilot in context of the other systems that are out there.
you are wrong. because the Driving Assistant Plus is just a package name. within the package you have several systems.That's not really apples to apples though, is it? Autopilot etc are marketing names for packages of assistance functions, all of which have names that are no more mysterious than the BMW versions.
View attachment 916133
The BMW analogy to Autopilot etc would (appear) to be 'Active Cruise Control with Stop and Go function', 'Driving Assistant Plus' and 'Parking Assistant Professional', none of which are any clearer in name than Autopilot or Enhanced Autopilot.
I tried to look up what BMW's equivalent function to Full Self Driving is but the closest they seem to have is a L3 function that hasn't launched yet but which will be called 'Personal Pilot', and if you want to tell me that the difference between Driving Assistant Plus and Personal Pilot is immediately obvious to anyone by name alone then I would suggest you're viewing this through a slightly biased lens.
Those are scenarios where you should indicate your intention, BMW trying to educatejust FYI: Lane keeping assistant was the first thing I turned off on my G20 BMW 330e.
it essentially looked if i am in full control and overstep the lane it then steered back. quite aggressively. So imagine when you have cars parked on the side or cyclist, to step on the lane a bit in order to pass by and it steers back....