Sharkbait
Member
Question: If we assume that Tesla's SC fee structure is indeed related to congestion then....How is it really removing congestion.
My answer is probably that of a statistical-outlier. Therefore, it may not be significant. When I first considered buying a Tesla (the Model 3 I still have on reserve), I didn't even consider or know anything about Tesla's Supercharger network. I reserved the car believing there would be a fairly large infrastructure available to me to charge for a fee. I next learned about installing power in my home to handle the charging at a very cost-effective rate and actually free from my from solar. So destination charging would be all that I would pay for. Again, the BEV charging network would be cheaper than ICE fuel.
As a loyalty member of various hotel brands, I'm selecting and charging at Marriott and IHG branded hotels that offer free Tesla chargers. I'm currently typing this post while my MS is charging off one of two Tesla 40A connections in a garage directly below my room for free. I've got all the apps and most of the adapters to charge off other chargers (except CHAdeMO) at this point. I'm still acquiring third-party charging network authorization cards.
Coming full circle and reserving the M3, I decided that I wouldn't need free SC'ing, and I wouldn't option it even if it was $1,000/yr. With the Model S, I'm using Tesla SC'ing network not because it's free. I'm using it because it's fast! Free is a minor benefit in my mind.
So your answer
My penalty model does two things; 1) It frees up Supercharger spots for those using these slots as "free" parking spaces after their car is charged, and/or 2) It penalizes those that abuse the system by creating a fund to build new Superchargers. Will people be required to charge at 2 AM in the morning because charging at 2 PM is impossible? Perhaps. It wouldn't be a good move on Tesla's part. Do you want to place the brand at risk because fisticuffs are breaking out at Superchargers? I don't think so.