I practice insurance defence law which has nothing to do with this area of law. My opinion is simply my own personal opinion based on a review of the documents that came with my vehicle. It is
not a legal opinion. (I would need to at least get paid for that
![Wink ;) ;)]()
).
But I think we're putting the cart in front of the horse here. Tesla has not said that they will take free Supercharging away with private sale -- only with CPO sales according to
@Indpowr. If they do take it away with private sales, I think they are opening themselves up to a lawsuit. I won't be a party to it but
@callmesam has said he would take action, and perhaps he would also consider being the representative plaintiff in a class action lawsuit. I would just warn him (as an individual and not a lawyer) to read his agreement with his lawyer carefully, even if it is a contingency agreement, since payment of disbursements, and the other party's costs and disbursements, may not be covered by the contingency agreement, and often are not. It is certainly not a suit I would be part of, but it is one I would take great interest in following. I don't know what the outcome would be because it's not my area of law, but even if it was, a lawyer would need full document disclosure before providing an opinion and a review of precedent case-law, and even then the initial opinion could change following discoveries.