Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Waymo

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Waymo and Tesla FSD. They are like iOS and Android. One was stable from the start, the other was feature rich from the start. Now both are very similar in terms of features as well as stability.
Yep, the biggest obstacle for Tesla right now is the door handle design (too confusing.)
I expect we’ll see the Robotaxi model next week with automatic doors.
 
Nothing positive about Tesla is new - nothing negative about Waymo is new ;)

Not at all. You really need to get over this "everybody is bias against Tesla" mindset.

And there is nothing negative about the Waymo post: they cover the high density Uber areas now with employee-only rides and they are slowly expanding their public rides to cover more of SF as part of their roll out strategy and soon it will cover the high density Uber areas as well. But because of your bias, you tried to spin it as a negative.
 
Anyone notice what's happening at 7 seconds? 🤦‍♂️

Certainly an interesting choice of material for a promotional clip.

Edit: That's heading North on South Grand Ave at Disney Concert Hall? If so, there's a construction site to the left of the vehicle occupying the curb lanes. Moving around it in the unclaimed central portion of the road may have been reasonable (trucks doing deliveries, etc.). Still a terrible clip for promotional material.
 
Last edited:
  • Helpful
Reactions: Doggydogworld
Certainly an interesting choice of material for a promotional clip.

Edit: That's heading North on South Grand Ave at Disney Concert Hall? If so, there's a construction site to the left of the vehicle occupying the curb lanes. Moving around it in the unclaimed central portion of the road may have been reasonable (trucks doing deliveries, etc.). Still a terrible clip for promotional material.

Maybe they _want_ to create a stir and then reveal that it's handling a construction zone.
 
Waymo releases safety data on 1M driverless miles:


Summary:
  • 18 minor and 2 major contact events in one million miles of operation
  • Other vehicle at fault in all vehicle to vehicle contacts. There were 4 contacts with physical objects, 3 of which caused no known damage
  • No reported injuries, no contacts at intersections, no contacts with vulnerable road users
  • All events were of a class unlikely to result in a severe crash or fatality, and the serious ones were front-to-rear which only account for 19% of serious crashes and 6% of fatalities in data on the general population.
  • In 55% of events, the Waymo vehicle was stopped and hit by somebody else

Brad Templeton's analysis in Forbes:

 
Last edited:
From an article on SlashGear:

Interestingly Waymo says that 55% of all collisions were caused by another driver hitting a Waymo vehicle that wasn't moving. Because all the computer code in the world and thousands of hours developing driving algorithms can't account for good old fashioned human error. Waymo also notes that no incidents happened within an intersection, which is typically the place of accidents where a human is driving.

Data collected during the tests also revealed that it was generally safer for its vehicles to travel between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., as there are general fewer vehicles around at night and substantially fewer pedestrians.

One million miles with only a few actual incidents is nothing to sneeze at, and the data will undoubtedly prove to be vital in future developments of the technology. If only there was a way for the car to account for other people's less-than-stellar driving records.


The problem is the media and the thirsty readers looking for scandals. Headlines with "Waymo involved in yet another accident", even though Waymo was not at fault, paints a poor picture for the public, who may turn sour on AVs sharing their roads.

 
  • Like
Reactions: diplomat33
Maybe they _want_ to create a stir and then reveal that it's handling a construction zone.
Waymo is genetically incapable of creating a stir :)

Looks like they’re basically neck and neck.
Waymo hit a million a few weeks before Cruise, but Cruise is piling up miles faster.

Waymo’s data supports my contention that achieving greater than human safety results in a very small percentage of collisions being at fault. Therefore liability cost concerns are overblown.
They may have 1/100th as many accidents but the jury awards will be 1000x higher.
 
The problem is the media and the thirsty readers looking for scandals. Headlines with "Waymo involved in yet another accident", even though Waymo was not at fault, paints a poor picture for the public, who may turn sour on AVs sharing their roads.

If time and time again, the fault is the bad human driver that was not paying attention or driving recklessly, I think/hope that people may realize that AVs are not the problem, human drivers are. So the public could shift to favor AVs more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nvx1977