I’m also unsure as to why the plaid on 19s tanked by 10%.No clue. Just relaying what I was told.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m also unsure as to why the plaid on 19s tanked by 10%.No clue. Just relaying what I was told.
Where did you read this out of curiosity.Unspecified "comfort and functionality" improvements applicable only to 2024 and cited as one of the reasons for range reduction in '24.
Where did you read this out of curiosity.
Thanks. I wasn’t questioning the legitimacy. I just wanted to research further.Tesla lowers Model Y, S, and X range estimations following exaggeration complaints
The estimated mileage on some trims has dropped by 37 miles.www.theverge.com
and dozens of other publications. It's also word for word what the chat rep on tesla.com told me when I asked them to break out the ratio of EPA testing changes vs their "comfort and functionality" changes. They read from the script and told me exactly what has already been quoted. When I asked them why there wasn't a reduction in MSLR 19", they said they had no information on that.
This has all already been discussed extensively in other threads.
What upgrades are you holding out for?
Is it going to be strange that your family hauler/suv is significantly quicker than your dedicated sports car?I was waiting for some decent changes before replacing my early 2022 MSP but just got a 911 allocation, so I will be going that route for the next one. I may miss the speed and the tech, but we plan to keep the MXP for a while, so we will still have access to it when needed.
911 turbo has basically the same 0-60 and 1/4 mile time, though the trap speed is lowerDoes it really?
911 turbo has basically the same 0-60 and 1/4 mile time, though the trap speed is lower
911 Turbo S is the closest. 0-60 in 2.1-2.2 seconds, and quarter mile high 9s.Close but not quite as fast in either. Unless you can link a stock variant that is faster than 2.8 seconds to 60.
911 Turbo S is the closest. 0-60 in 2.1-2.2 seconds, and quarter mile high 9s.
911 Turbo S is the closest. 0-60 in 2.1-2.2 seconds, and quarter mile high 9s.
ICE 0-60 times are a crap shoot.
It is doable with some mods:
Hopefully not...the Plaid speed is great, but it's not something I make use of often. I can make use of better handling, a nicer interior, and the improved overall quality of the 911. If they make some improvements to the S, we may eventually trade the X in for another S since we don't need an SUV and could get away with a larger sedan for the main car.Is it going to be strange that your family hauler/suv is significantly quicker than your dedicated sports car?
Hopefully not...the Plaid speed is great, but it's not something I make use of often. I can make use of better handling, a nicer interior, and the improved overall quality of the 911. If they make some improvements to the S, we may eventually trade the X in for another S since we don't need an SUV and could get away with a larger sedan for the main car.
Unlike Tesla, Porsche quotes very conservative numbers (and no roll out shenanigans). Real world tests show the 0-60 in the 2.1s range without rollout.Their fastest advertised is the 911 Turbo S with the Sport Chrono package at 2.6. Keep in mind the MXP's 0-60 is 0.2 seconds faster than Tesla's claim proven over and over on the street and dragstrip.
Unlike Tesla, Porsche quotes very conservative numbers (and no roll out shenanigans). Real world tests show the 0-60 in the 2.1s range without rollout.
That's true although Porsche is one of the more consistent. Make no mistake, if it wasn't just about straight line performance, I'd pick the 911 Turbo S as my daily driver over an MXP any day of the week.