PearlModelS
Member
Can anyone offer a comparison between the Nokia winter tires (Nokian is a genitive in Finnish), i.e. Hakkapeliitta R2s, and the Pirellis with regard to characteristics other than grip and stability on snow/ice/wet/dry roads? Although those are the most important things, I'm also curious how the tires affect range and how they wear (especially on an S85). And do rims other than OEM affect the driving in any way? I'd rather not pay for expensive rims if I don't have to, although in my country, the rim+Pirelli price is on the low side.
I had Hakka's on a previous S500 and they were terrific, probably better than the Pirelli's. With that said, this winter had Pirelli's Winter run flats on the MS and the car was a rock. No significant wear on about 4k miles of travel, most on dry pavement. They were on a set of TSW's, the entire package purchased from Tirerack. I went for the easy route since Tirerack does not have Hakka's and purchased the whole package at once at a reasonable out of pocket price.
No difference in range that I could tell either, but my summers are 21's. They were quieter than the 21's too, but that was because the rears had significant inside wear to the belts.
Probably my ultimate package would be stock 19's, powdered coated black, with Hakka's for winter.
Boy, did I confuse you or what? :smile: