You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not right. Here's how I calculate how it breaks down:
GVWR is ~6400 lbs - Heavy SUV depreciation rules apply
For this example – Assume you use the vehicle 100% for business to make the math simpler, and assume a $100K purchase price.
- You can write off $25,000 ($25k limit on heavy SUVs) of the cost thanks to the Section 179 deduction on new equipment.
- Then, you will be able to write off another $37,500 thanks to first year bonus depreciation (.50($100,000-$25,000)).
- Then, you follow the regular business depreciation rules to depreciate the remaining cost of $37,500 over 5 years. (20% x $37,500) = $7,500. You take this amount quarterly, so if you buy in third quarter, you'd take half this amount in 2017.
So 1st first-year depreciation write-off equals ($25,000 + $37,500 + $3,750 = $66,250). Now if you are in a high tax bracket like I am this might actually save you 45% in combined Federal and state taxes, so just the depreciation savings will result in a ($66,250 * .45) = ~$30K tax savings.
Add your $7,500 Federal tax credit and your total tax savings the first year is ~$37,500.
Caveats:
You are only supposed to take depreciation based on business use of the vehicle. If you only use it 80% for business your depreciation will only be 80% of the $30K.
You should confirm this with your own CPA.
Could you please recommend a book on net promotion?
It seems too early to make any predictions on any future M3 pricing changes, when we don't any of the following:I agree with you that Tesla does not need to lower Model 3 ASP, and I agree with @MitchJi that they will lower it sooner than they need to.
I just don't think EAP/FSD options will be thrown in for free until federal tax credit phase out and/or other manufacturers offer FSD.
We have a price target of $165 on Tesla: Barclays' Brian ...
Bwaahahaha!! I love the questions posed in this interview. 'We have a $165 price target on this stock, but don't ever see it going there'.
To quote Bugs Bunny, what an ultra-maroon.[
Yes! We have been wrong for more than the last year and expect to be wrong for more than next year also.
It seems too early to make any predictions on any future M3 pricing changes, when we don't any of the following:
- changes in growth trajectory, remember 500K in 2020 plan?
- competitive landscape, including pricing comparison vs the MY
- whether Tesla will lower the price or instead add feature/performance like in MS/X
- future changes in incentives, including those outside of the US Federal government
- other new Tesla products that could wag their revenue and profit growth
- last but maybe most important, the current M3 pricing
They need to move the "demand" to the model Y to motivate "suppliers" in a step and repeat way.I think its much simpler then that. As long as demand outstrips supply by a wide margin, today is probably by a million cars over the next 18 months then they will not contemplate any price changes even with Fed incentives ramping down throughout next year. Its sill to increase demand if you cannot fulfill the orders. Sell the damn things with some margin and turn a profit for once. Also dont forget that they need to fund 5 more gigafactories and Model Y, Semi and Pickup.
They need to move the "demand" to the model Y to motivate "suppliers" in a step and repeat way.
The need to move the demand out of that factory, so they can meet it without inviting competition.
I expect September to be when they slide the stack of chips over to the Y.
By 2019 the data collected by Tesla cars could have value equal to about a quarter of current valuation according to this analyst: Tesla Model 3: This analyst is excited about data
I see another potential business here:Timing would be right based on when the 3 was revealed vs today. Elon said Y would go into production in 2019.
I dont think they need anything to motivate suppliers more. Meaning, they can already leverage Model 3s growth in production to sufficiently motivate suppliers, but yes Y would would help them to negotiate even better pricing. Y could also require a lot fewer suppliers if its truly going to be revolutionary as it relates to automated manufacturing. You would think many components would need to be designed to be automated. Tesla seems to be wanting to become more and more vertically integrated. Maybe suppliers will be moving into the Y Factory in some cases, just like Gigafactory1.
I see another potential business here:
1) streamline the MS3XY design and consolidate the different types of parts that need to be made
2) have Grohmann look at the highest volume parts and see if those can be integrated in house more efficiently
I try to read most posts, but some are distinctly weird unless I go to bottom of page, hit "show ignored content" scroll back up, Think oh , him again, still here, still successful, but it's general discussion, but seriously, please.....You're like talking to a wall only way less intellectually stimulating because the wall a) sticks to what it knows, b) doesn't change its position, and c) serves a purpose.
Timing would be right based on when the 3 was revealed vs today. Elon said Y would go into production in 2019.
I dont think they need anything to motivate suppliers more. Meaning, they can already leverage Model 3s growth in production to sufficiently motivate suppliers, but yes Y would would help them to negotiate even better pricing. Y could also require a lot fewer suppliers if its truly going to be revolutionary as it relates to automated manufacturing. You would think many components would need to be designed to be automated. Tesla seems to be wanting to become more and more vertically integrated. Maybe suppliers will be moving into the Y Factory in some cases, just like Gigafactory1.
Might I suggest those that reply to the beartrolls that most of us have on our iList, helpfully include in their reply:I try to read most posts, but some are distinctly weird unless I go to bottom of page, hit "show ignored content" scroll back up, Think oh , him again, still here, still successful, but it's general discussion, but seriously, please.....
Mongo,I think I see what you are suggesting. Stacking in the vertical space during the journey down/ up? If the sled itself could be the elevator floor, they could queue up on the surface and then allow multiple vehicles to descend simultaneously. The sled reload would then cut into the efficiency.
From reddit - look at the front wheels at 3s into the video... Something strange happening methinks. Or am I mistaken?