You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you please elaborate? I'm new here, so not too familiar with these people. What makes it fiction?That's Paulo Santos. Therefore it is fiction. He's not blatantly dishonest like Montana Skeptic, but he *is* harboring delusions about Tesla.
1) Zantos had a short position in TSLACan you please elaborate? I'm new here, so not too familiar with these people. What makes it fiction?
He also claims the GF was downsized
Nah. Real tin is too expensive. Send him heavier lead foil hats. It seems his neck isn't getting much exercise as it is.The state of Nevada just did an audit and gave them millions in incentives for exceeding their goals. That must be quite an effective snow job to fool the auditors that a downsized factory is actually much larger than planned at this stage. Maybe people should start sending this guy tinfoil hats.
For those of us who don't happen to subscribe to Vanity Fair, is there a link?April 2017's Vanity Fair: Oops. Neither Maureen Dowd nor her editor knows the difference between steel and aluminum.... "Elon Musk's Future Shock", p. 116. I'll let y'all find the goof.
Non subscription versionFor those of us who don't happen to subscribe to Vanity Fair, is there a link?
somebody called phillip davis. a newbie throwing the kitchen sink, a collandar of spaghetti, silly putty, those sticky wall walkers to justify his thesis. equating the Bolt and the Model 3, zero to negative knowledge of EV's and PHEV's. not a sly misrepresenter of facts like galileleo, not honest like bill cunningham, whom is actually knowledgeable and pleasant and i would actually trust somewhat. I called them on a lying graph (which word gets auto deletion on SA) about PBNS (produced but not sold) implying 12,509 'missing' and created a firestorm to the point of they told me to write an article, but they partially revised with grudging admission the graph was crap and ~2,000 is not ~12,509. if data is HONEST i accept it IF it is presented HONESTLY and COMPLETELY, they are just sly about itI don't click on those to avoid giving them money. Which clown is that one by?