Garlan Garner
Banned
So wait....where did you get that info?So they're going to have drive-on-nav for EAP and FSD but the FSD version will change lanes in to other cars less often? I'm curious how they're going to word that on the website.![]()
Link?
So wait....where did you get that info?So they're going to have drive-on-nav for EAP and FSD but the FSD version will change lanes in to other cars less often? I'm curious how they're going to word that on the website.![]()
It way my understanding that Drive-on-nav uses all 8 cameras.
That should have been "It was my understanding that Drive on NAV will use all 8 cameras." It's been promised but does not exist yet. Therefore, future tense.
Yes, exactly
It does now as of V9, yes.So...does EAP use/require all 8 cameras?
AutopilotSo wait....where did you get that info?
Link?
It does now as of V9, yes.
Autopilot
View attachment 346022
So, for now, drive-on-nav is included with enhanced autopilot. Or am I misinterpreting this somehow?
Exactly. So they should take that bit off the website if they haven't already.Soo...since EVERYTHING ( EAP and FSD and all future features ) require all 8 cameras......then the number of cameras utilized makes no difference in this discussion.
What will the website say tomorrow or next week about EAP?
FSD was available on the website last week...right?
$100 supercharger credit was there last week also...right?
I don't think anyone is denying that the website can change. I'm just saying that currently drive-on-nav is part of EAP. I would feel ripped off if later they decided to charge me more money for it and I don't see any reason to believe that will happen. Has Tesla ever done something like that before?What will the website say tomorrow or next week.
FSD was available on the website last week...right?
Exactly. So they should take that bit off the website if they haven't already.
Things change very quickly in Tesla land. I do believe however drive on nav - anything on a divided highway will be covered by EAP. Job is fine after it takes the exit.
The past often determines the future. Tesla's website and it's contents have historically been used in lawsuits against the company.If Tesla's policies change very quickly....then how do you know where any feature will exist tomorrow? Why are we continuing to use an ever evolving website to determine the future?
Drive-on-nav makes the most sense in context of EAP for now. But drive-on-nav is enhanced when the other FSD features are present allowing you to actually get to your final destination.
The past often determines the future. Tesla's website and it's contents have historically been used in lawsuits against the company.
In this instance the on-ramp to off-ramp bit has been a part of the autopilot promises since the very beginning.
I don't think anyone is denying that the website can change. I'm just saying that currently drive-on-nav is part of EAP. I would feel ripped off if later they decided to charge me more money for it and I don't see any reason to believe that will happen. Has Tesla ever done something like that before?
I love Tesla but have been a number of recurring themes with over promising and under delivering, manufacturing issues (roadster, S, X, and 3), and poor customer service in certain areas and great customer service in other areas. As they grow and try to improve, some things stay the same.The only thing we know about Tesla's past is that their past DOES NOT determine the future.
I love Tesla but have been a number of recurring themes with over promising and under delivering, manufacturing issues (roadster, S, X, and 3), and poor customer service in certain areas and great customer service in other areas. As they grow and try to improve, some things stay the same.
We have to look at the website in terms of when we purchase something. What is being advertised vs what's being delivered. This is where Tesla has lost lawsuits whether that's in horsepower figures or feature timelines.