sroy
Closed
Basically that orders received between june 1 and july 1st at the dealership can be made eligible was my understanding.What did VW say?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically that orders received between june 1 and july 1st at the dealership can be made eligible was my understanding.What did VW say?
Here is the link to the Electrek article.Electrek just reported Tesla is experiencing some form of Containment Hold at Fremont for 10k cars. Definitely indicates a pushback of dates is likely. My page has been blank in terms of delivery date since Saturday.
I just registered the attend the meeting.I signed up for Charge Up NJ alerts and just got this email... wheels in motion! View attachment 663723
Was afraid of that. So it says they are seeking comments on this proposed revision, which I guess means it’s not definite yet. Who can comment?For those who read the document the biggest chunk as some expected is a cap of 2K for msrp above 45k still with a 55k cap. Not done reading…
I agree. We can look at it from 2 perspectives: a) how to frame the discussion so that "we" still get our 5K b) from a "state" perspective does that version of the program will encourage non-EV buyers to get SR+? If b is true, that's probably the right thing to do. But if they get leftover funds at the end of the year (if the rebate had no influence on the sales figures they would), then it's that the M3LR and MYLR are the "gap" vehicle. Sells too much to make the program viable but any other won't reach the objective.Mach E, ID4 and everything else outside the 3 SR+ are basically over 45k. Would be a shitty thing to do when trying to get adoption.
But in the bulletin it states they want to get more EVs on the road and more variety, not just tesla. So doing this would counter act that. They need to not do that at all, would push me to the Acura I am looking at.I agree. We can look at it from 2 perspectives: a) how to frame the discussion so that "we" still get our 5K b) from a "state" perspective does that version of the program will encourage non-EV buyers to get SR+? If b is true, that's probably the right thing to do. But if they get leftover funds at the end of the year (if the rebate had no influence on the sales figures they would), then it's that the M3LR and MYLR are the "gap" vehicle. Sells too much to make the program viable but any other won't reach the objective.
If they run it like this this year and they end up expending the whole budget resulting in SR+ sales increases, the program works IMO. If it doesn't change the SR+ sales figures in the state, phase 1 was the right implementation.
It's not possible. The document mentions that 97% of the funding was 5000K amount which are the MY LR, M3 LR/SR+, Mache and the other 2 I always forget about. More than half the 5K qualified vehicles are more then 45K and more then half are Tesla. It's 90% in sales volume. Which the rebate did not affect much IMO. I do not believe you can convince people to buy more of the non-Tesla EVs with only 5K except maybe the mache, but at that price point, it doesn't work (short of saying "Telsa get 2, ford 5"). The only sensible option below 45K is the SR+.But in the bulletin it states they want to get more EVs on the road and more variety, not just tesla. So doing this would counter act that. They need to not do that at all, would push me to the Acura I am looking at.