It was not build voluntarily, but by a madman, unlike our wall.The Atlantic Wall wasn't built by the US, but we did roll tanks through it.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was not build voluntarily, but by a madman, unlike our wall.The Atlantic Wall wasn't built by the US, but we did roll tanks through it.
Chevy Bolt isn't a Tesla Model 3 competitor: erratic pricing, poor buying experience
Teslarati, so biased of course.
There is something that you overlooked. Some people will pay more money for more performance.
Toyota Prius, 17.8 @ 79 mph
Honda Fit, 16.8 @ 84 mph
BMW i3, 15.8 @ 86 mph
Chevy Bolt, 15.0 @ 93 mph *
Tesla Model S 60, 14.2 @ 98 mph
Ford Mustang, V6, 14.1 @ 102 mph
Teslarati is the Fox news of Tesla
It will be once there are more compelling vehicles. Let's be real, the Bolt as an ICE is basically a Honda Fit, not really compelling. The only reason we are at all "excited" about it is it's the only other 200+ mile EV besides Tesla.
I don't see that as brushing it off. He said being the only 200+mile EV besides Tesla is the only reason we're at all excited about it. I see that as a true statement.I find it humorous how you brush off the whole "200+ mile EV" point like it's some minor added feature like an additional cup holder.
That'd be like saying "The Tesla Supercharger network just adds a few additional charging options for owners. No biggie."
I find it humorous how you brush off the whole "200+ mile EV" point like it's some minor added feature like an additional cup holder.
That'd be like saying "The Tesla Supercharger network just adds a few additional charging options for owners. No biggie."
I don't think he's brushing off that it's 200+ miles, I believe he's saying that it's the only compelling part about the vehicle, at that price point.
I don't think he's brushing off that it's 200+ miles, I believe he's saying that it's the only compelling part about the vehicle, at that price point.
I guess the single point of being the first <$40k, 200+ mile BEV was more than enough to snag all those automotive awards. Imagine if GM actually tried! Tesla would be in real trouble! Lol
I agree that it would be nice if GM actually tried, yes.
Speaking personally, I think the Bolt has other great attributes beyond just the 200+ range:I don't see that as brushing it off. He said being the only 200+mile EV besides Tesla is the only reason we're at all excited about it. I see that as a true statement.
That is his opinion. While most the automotive press and Bolt owners disagree with him, for his purposes, it is only a faster version of a Honda Fit and automotive performance is not a feature he finds "compelling".
As I clearly explained previously the performance is a direct result of it being a 200+ mile EV, so my statement included it's inherent performance which results from a 200+ mile EV.
No, ICE's in general would be in real trouble, which is exactly why GM didn't really try and instead farmed it out to LG.Imagine if GM actually tried! Tesla would be in real trouble!
Do you think the Bolt's #1 competitor, the Nissan Leaf, will ever make a serious tech effort?
So you are saying that when the Leaf and i3 received sizable battery increases their performance went up?
Having a bigger battery pack makes it relatively easy to have good performance but it's not entirely a given. You still need to spend a little more on the inverter, cabling, and motor. Renault has a 40 kWh BEV now with anemic performance.As I clearly explained previously the performance is a direct result of it being a 200+ mile EV, so my statement included it's inherent performance which results from a 200+ mile EV.