Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) SpaceX and Boeing Developments

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Eric Berger:

NASA will pay Boeing more than twice as much as SpaceX for crew seats

Boeing, in flying 24 astronauts, has a per-seat price of $183 million. SpaceX, in flying 56 astronauts during the same time frame, has a seat price of $88 million. Thus, NASA is paying Boeing 2.1 times the price per seat that it is paying SpaceX, inclusive of development costs incurred by NASA.
But incredibly, Boeing is probably losing money:
From these numbers it may seem like Boeing is profiteering from a government program, but that is likely not the case. Commercial crew is a fixed-price program, which means the companies are responsible for overruns. Boeing has already reported about half a billion dollars in charges due to the need to refly an uncrewed Starliner demonstration mission. Two sources told Ars the program has been a money-loser for Boeing, as it has struggled to manage the transition from cost-plus to fixed-price contracts.
 
The Starliner program is not only a fiscal disaster for Boeing but is also a huge technical embarrassment.

What ever convinced NASA that Boeing, a company that has never built a crewed spacecraft, could actually do it? At least SpaceX had already convincingly demonstrated that it could reliably send cargo to the ISS.

How the mighty have fallen.
 
The Starliner program is not only a fiscal disaster for Boeing but is also a huge technical embarrassment.

What ever convinced NASA that Boeing, a company that has never built a crewed spacecraft, could actually do it? At least SpaceX had already convincingly demonstrated that it could reliably send cargo to the ISS.

How the mighty have fallen.
The fact that SpaceX appears to have done it exceedingly well on their first try as a company in their teens as compared to Boeing who has decades of history and experience with aviation engineering makes that all the more embarrassing...
 
It didn't help that Boeing tried for reusable elements with their capsule. They should have just gone with a big dumb non-reusable capsule with parachutes. Then they should have pulled a SpaceX and dropped the complexity the moment they saw it was going to slow down the process and progress. NASA was clear that these had to be the safest vehicles ever. Adding a bunch of complexity to go for a fancy land landing (true with SpaceX also) is just asking for problems to arise. SpaceX is very good at pivoting. Boeing? Not so much.
 
It didn't help that Boeing tried for reusable elements with their capsule. They should have just gone with a big dumb non-reusable capsule with parachutes. Then they should have pulled a SpaceX and dropped the complexity the moment they saw it was going to slow down the process and progress. NASA was clear that these had to be the safest vehicles ever. Adding a bunch of complexity to go for a fancy land landing (true with SpaceX also) is just asking for problems to arise. SpaceX is very good at pivoting. Boeing? Not so much.

While a absolutely agree with this, all of their failures have been for basic things. Would they have really done any better had they gone with an expendable capsule?

Just seems like real issues at Boeing are MUCH bigger than the Starliner program.
 
While a absolutely agree with this, all of their failures have been for basic things. Would they have really done any better had they gone with an expendable capsule?

Just seems like real issues at Boeing are MUCH bigger than the Starliner program.
They are very much bigger. Note the 2.3 billion dollar loss they posted in Defense & Space. And the continuing problems in Commercial.
 
So the first crewed Starliner mission will be over 3 years after Crew Dragon Demo-2.

And cost far more.
Boeing's delays did allow SpaceX to get 8 (currently) additional crew launches from NASA. And with the last launch, Crew 6, it was the completion of the original contract that SpaceX was awarded back on September 16, 2014. The additional launches bring NASA's payment to SpaceX up to $4.93 billion. Boeing's initial contract for 6 launches was $4.2 billion. Not included in the contract but SpaceX is building anyway is a fifth Crew Dragon. SpaceX had originally only planned on building just four but the extra demand for other commercial and NASA missions showed the need for a fifth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr
Boeing's delays did allow SpaceX to get 8 (currently) additional crew launches from NASA. And with the last launch, Crew 6, it was the completion of the original contract that SpaceX was awarded back on September 16, 2014. The additional launches bring NASA's payment to SpaceX up to $4.93 billion. Boeing's initial contract for 6 launches was $4.2 billion. Not included in the contract but SpaceX is building anyway is a fifth Crew Dragon. SpaceX had originally only planned on building just four but the extra demand for other commercial and NASA missions showed the need for a fifth.
SpaceX was planning on deprecating their Dragon production before Boeing executed their first crewed mission.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: EVCollies