So, Tesla updates Supercharger billing to add cost of electricity use for other than charging - Electrek
I already have seen a post on Facebook with somebody being charged for 65kWh while adding 56kWh, which is about 16% extra cost. That prompted me to revise my calculations of Wh consumption per mile:
SuC: added 438kWh, plus let's say 10% for charging inefficiencies and heating while charging, becomes 481kWh
Home charging: TeslaFi already presents two values, kWh Added = 444.84 and kWh Used = 506.52, which again is 13.87%
So while in TeslaFi Drive Summary it looks like I used 676.7 kWh to drive 1950 miles, at 347 Wh/mile, in reality I have driven 1998 miles and have a estimated range of 91, and used in total 988 kWh, averaging 472.9 Wh/mile which is a whopping 36.28% more than what the TeslaFi and the car average tells me.
Obviously it depends massively on how everybody uses the car, besides temperature and driving stile, it's now about how many times you used preheating, the sentry mode and refreshed the Tesla app.
I already have seen a post on Facebook with somebody being charged for 65kWh while adding 56kWh, which is about 16% extra cost. That prompted me to revise my calculations of Wh consumption per mile:
SuC: added 438kWh, plus let's say 10% for charging inefficiencies and heating while charging, becomes 481kWh
Home charging: TeslaFi already presents two values, kWh Added = 444.84 and kWh Used = 506.52, which again is 13.87%
So while in TeslaFi Drive Summary it looks like I used 676.7 kWh to drive 1950 miles, at 347 Wh/mile, in reality I have driven 1998 miles and have a estimated range of 91, and used in total 988 kWh, averaging 472.9 Wh/mile which is a whopping 36.28% more than what the TeslaFi and the car average tells me.
Obviously it depends massively on how everybody uses the car, besides temperature and driving stile, it's now about how many times you used preheating, the sentry mode and refreshed the Tesla app.