You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So did no one at the VA see any of the studies saying hydroxychloroquine is not effective and has rather severe cardiac negatives, or is Trump just insisting they give it one more shot before they start the Lysol injections?
If you look at the plots in that paper or anywhere on the internet on excess mortality, the spikes all coincide exactly with when COVID19 hit.
Now, we can definitely entertain that some of the excess mortality is not due to COVID, but side effects due to shutdown from COVID.
So perhaps some people are dying at home because they are afraid of going to the hospital.
But there are also less people dying because they aren't engaging in as much risky behavior like less driving. Would be interesting to see the stats on all of that. In general:
Total Deaths = Baseline + Covid + SideEffects - SuppressedDeaths.
These studies show that Total Deaths - Baseline are much higher than the measured Covid deaths, like 2x.
Which means if there was no reduction of some types of deaths (suppressed), the SideEffect deaths must have gone up the same amount as the deaths attributed to COVID.
But since there are some types of deaths that are reduced, this means the SideEffects deaths must have increased even further than the measured COVID deaths.
And since some folks believe COVID deaths are overreported, this means the SideEffect deaths must be even higher, heck, maybe 2x or 3x the actual COVID deaths.
This basically seems quite unrealistic. It is much more likely that the side effect and suppressed deaths are closer to balancing each other out, and most likely COVID deaths are higher (maybe not 2x) then currently reported.
I like how denialists always behave like numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths are about to fall to zero tomorrow.
Oh, and keep these all cherrypicked statistics and apple-to-hand grenade comparisons coming!
In our case, if California, a government entity that taxes everything including the air, birth, and death, cannot govern itself, our country will collapse at some point. We just think C19 is a major crisis, when a real one hits, our state is sunk. It's rudderless. NY is not different in this regard except it has a lower population.
My understanding, which I guess is incorrect, is that UV-C had to be totally isolated. I read a few reviews on various products that use UV-C where people complained that they couldn't tell when the bulb was burnt out because no light ever showed.
It's like having a real estate agent recommend that you reject a house because the drapes don't match the floor tiles, while steering the client in the direction of buying the house across the street, you know, that nice one over there that's on fire.
the phrase is 'carpets don't match the drapes' but that's getting WAY off topic, here.
(lol)
I have 2 products that I bought, recently, that have a uvc 'window' for users to confirm its working.
one is this philips and the other is a 'germ guardian' mostly a no-name brand so I can't vouch for how much testing they did or how good their design is.
glass blocks a lot of the uv bands. maybe they have some glass there, or its the right kind of plastic that also filters it out.
finally, we're talking 3w, here. I'm also guessing that with that low power, any filter they put between you and it is going to be enough. no one suggests looking at the bare bulb, but both products seem to have a view port and I know philips would not continue making/selling these in europe if they were at all unsafe.
Question:
can you use this device (after some modification) to disinfect a cellphone? Is the UV light strong enough?
Answer: Not sure!
It is the correct frequency UV-C which is the frequency for germicidal disinfecting. It's not really strong so it would probably take a while 30 minutes or more and if you look at it it will definitely ruin your eyes!!!!!!
Oh, Colorado.
Should make for some interesting data collection in the next week or two.
Castle Rock restaurant reopens in defiance of statewide public health order
It only takes one that doesn't...On one hand, sick people are likely to self-isolate.
...The source of the outbreak, according to the public health department, was a party guest who was reportedly coughing and not wearing a face covering. The other guests at the gathering of family and friends also were not wearing coverings or practicing social distancing....
...“One person showed up to the party exhibiting symptoms and joking she may have the virus"...
Excellent and clear article on the risk.
Basically impossible to catch outside in any normal setting.
On one hand, sick people are likely to self-isolate.