You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guess the superintendent must be reading TMC. They took my advice! Who knew this thread would be the clearinghouse of all rational COVID advice? Unfortunately the thread also includes the advice of a bunch of loons.
https://twitter.com/chrisjosewsb/status/1292564766100279296?s=21
Cruise ship, with masks and iso.
59% caught covid19
Of 80% of that 59% were asymptomatic.
COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton
Note well
Passengers issued with surgical masks
Crew issued with N95 mask respirators.
https://thorax.bmj.com/content/thoraxjnl/75/8/693/F1.large.jpg
The masks were provided after the outbreak. Surgical masks are not going to work very well in a cruise ship environment. It's all about odds, you're rolling the dice more often in an enclosed poorly ventilated environment. Even if your odds are better on an individual roll, the sheer number of chances means your luck will run out quickly.Cruise ship, with masks and iso.
59% caught covid19
Of 80% of that 59% were asymptomatic.
COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton
Note well
Passengers issued with surgical masks
Crew issued with N95 mask respirators.
https://thorax.bmj.com/content/thoraxjnl/75/8/693/F1.large.jpg
This information by itself is meaningless in terms of understanding the transmission process. When were the masks distributed? One has to presume that they're distributed after they discovered that Covid 19 is on the ship? In that context how do you know how much transmission has already taken place? What was the compliance? Was their social distancing Before & After mask distribution? What was the ventillation arrangements and process in relationship to indoor gatherings? Again I'm not sure why you're posting this - it really looks as though you're trying to attack the use of masks.
I'd take a step back from that - you've been given plenty of feedback about this line of analysis. And you haven't responded to any of it. Instead you're doubling down on what looks like a very foolish narrative. It's looking as though you're lining up with covid-19 denial and minimization? Is that really what you're trying to do? Not clear
DIY testing kits are absolutely worthless. People will not stick the swab far enough to where it needs to go.Thousands of children test positive for COVID-19 ahead of new school year | RochesterFirst
Nearly 100,000 children tested positive for the coronavirus in the last two weeks of July, a new report from the American Academy of Pediatrics finds. Just over 97,000 children tested positive for the coronavirus from July 16 to July 30, according to the association.
Out of almost 5 million reported COVID-19 cases in the U.S., CBS News’ Michael George reports that the group found that more than 338,000 were children.
The university the study is affiliated with (Vanderbilt) is using DIY saliva tests for all their students. They also verify that sample is collected properly via a Zoom call. Not sure if they're using the same test for the study.DIY testing kits are absolutely worthless. People will not stick the swab far enough to where it needs to go.
The severity seems about normal. 8 of 128 positives required hospitalization, 4 intubated, and 1 died. There were 97 crew, 43% of the total number (of people on the ship, doesn't say how many were positive), so the average age probably isn't as high as you might think. Also these were all people healthy enough to take a cruise. Presumably the true number of cases was higher than 128.What part of 80% asymptomatic rate is not impressive.
Seriously, is there any other dataset with such good health outcomes for what is presumably an older cohort with covid19?
Either
They caught covid19 before mask use or after mask use, but something resulted in low severity of the disease despite allowing wide transmission.
Overall it does not sound like a great cruise experience.A total of eight passengers and crew were medically evacuated from the ship to hospitals in Montevideo, all for impending respiratory failure, including a 70-year-old woman with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (evacuated day 20), a 65-year-old woman with no comorbidities (evacu- ated day 21), and two crew and one passenger evacuated on day 22. A seventh passenger, a 68-year-old man, developed fever on day 23 (15 days after cabin isolation) and was evacuated for hypoxaemia on day 24. One of the two ship physicians required medical evacuation on day 27 also for hypoxaemia.
...Overall it does not sound like a great cruise experience.
My unscientific wild ass Hypothesis,
reduced viral load due to isolation, mask and respirator use results in reduced initial viral load, leading to increased asymptomatic patients. Which is one way to improve the survival rate.
This is what I find mind-boggling about your posts. These claims about swine flu just don’t fit the facts. If this were remotely similar to swine flu, obviously we’d be treating it like that - life would go on pretty much as normal!
It really makes no sense. The response has been super disruptive, and it’s not like anyone wants that. It’s bad for everyone except perhaps Zoom and a few others. But it’s not like they planned it. So obviously there is something very very different about C19 - it’s not some mass delusion. There’s just no way for that to be the case.
As far as school is concerned, I don’t think there is a single sane American, D or R, who does not want schools opened ASAP. Obviously it is something everyone wants! That is not the issue at all; there is widespread agreement that schools should reopen ASAP, and that it is absolutely critical for the children and for everyone else. It’s just a question of how and when and where. That’s where the craziness and detachment from reality begins. The sad thing is that in many locations, it simply is not possible to do in any workable manner at this point.
Death by analogy:
Don't quit your day job.