Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Coronavirus

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Like I said - anecdotally, I have heard of an instance where workers at a vaccination site in Texas who were not able to find enough volunteers to be vaccinated at the end of the day when they had left-over vaccines, despite an abundance of people around who were not yet vaccinated. One example doesn't mean this is normal, of course, and the information I have found says that they are still supply limited overall.

Fully reopening now is just crazy when we are just a couple months away from having enough vaccines for just about everyone, especially when there is still plenty of COVID going around in Texas.

That was a story about a doctor who was trying to find people who FIT THE CATEGORY of people able to take the vacciene. He was subsequently fired for what he did, which was give it away to the people he thought needed protecting the most. This happened locally to me, by a doctor in a town that I have projects in.

Hasan Gokal, doctor fired after giving away expiring doses of COVID-19 vaccine, speaks out - CBS News

The problem is that unless you're in the category that's active (currently 1B) then legally you're not allowed to get the vaccine. And it was late and he couldn't find people that fit in that category that hadn't already been vaccinated. Ridiculous what happened. And racist
 
Last edited:
Another reason Texas is in a rush to reopen: money.

California relies on income and capital gains taxes for revenue. It lucked out big time with the stock market/tech boom, and is swimming in surpluses. The state has more than enough cash in the coffers to eat the losses from keeping restaurants and tourist attractions closed. On the other hand, Texas relies on sales taxes and oil taxes for revenue, and those are down during the pandemic. The Texas state government has a much stronger revenue need for reopening than California.

That explains why Abbott wants to get rid of capacity limits: packed bars and theaters pay more tax than half empty ones. (Still doesn't explain getting rid of mask rules.)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: byeLT4 and madodel
Texas relies on sales taxes and oil taxes for revenue
Actually Texas relies on property taxes. No change there. The no mask statment is more about distracting from the energy crisis of the other week. Anyone who used Griddy just got something like a $50,000+ electricity bill for the month. Kind of the energy equivalent of a short seller. (Actually, I don't know how it would work if you had Griddy, solar, and Powerwalls and make sure you did not take anything from the grid. Maybe you could even sell some back at the $9,999 /kW. Nah.)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: madodel
Another reason Texas is in a rush to reopen: money.
Texas relies on sales taxes and oil taxes for revenue, and those are down during the pandemic. The Texas state government has a much stronger revenue need for reopening than California.
Actually Texas relies on property taxes. No change there.

Several things it appears via: Texas - Texas Tax Rates & Rankings | Texas State Taxes | Tax Foundation and Everything You Need to Know About Taxes in Texas

6.25% / Rank: 13 / State Sales Tax Rate
1.94% / Average Local Sales Tax Rate
8.19% / Rank: 14 / Combined State and Average Local Sales Tax Rate

$1259 / Rank:6 / State and Local General Sales Tax Collections per Capita
20¢ / Rank: 44 / State Gasoline Tax Rate (cents per gallon)
$1.41 / Rank: 21 / State Cigarette Tax Rate (dollars per 20-pack)
1.69% / Rank: 7 / Property Taxes Paid as a Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Value
$1872 / Rank: 13 / State and Local Property Tax Collections Per Capita
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NikolaACDC
Only if you misinterpret what I said.

Surely you know older voters vote R in larger numbers.

I didn't mis-interpret what you said. You literally said "it's the old who vote R". You implied that young people don't. Well I'm hear to tell you that I know an absolute crap ton of people 50 and well, well under who most certainly vote Republican and praise and voted for Trump in particular. I know them, live near and among them So if you want to hang your hat on the population aging out of Republican voter ranks well I think you're going to be sadly surprised.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: scottf200
Shouldn't come as a surprise

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/03/04/coronavirus-overweight-global-report/

"The report, by the World Obesity Federation, found that 88 percent of deaths due to covid-19 in the first year of the pandemic were in countries where more than half of the population is classified as overweight, which it defines as having a body mass index (BMI) above 25. Obesity, generally defined as BMI above 30, is associated with particularly severe outcomes.
...
The report found that in countries where less than half of the adult population is classified as overweight, the likelihood of death from covid-19 was about one-tenth of the levels in countries with higher shares of overweight adults. A higher BMI was also associated with increased risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive or critical care and the need for mechanically assisted ventilation.
In Britain, overweight coronavirus patients were 67 percent more likely to require intensive care, and obese patients three times likelier."
 
Another reason Texas is in a rush to reopen: money.

California relies on income and capital gains taxes for revenue. It lucked out big time with the stock market/tech boom, and is swimming in surpluses. The state has more than enough cash in the coffers to eat the losses from keeping restaurants and tourist attractions closed. On the other hand, Texas relies on sales taxes and oil taxes for revenue, and those are down during the pandemic. The Texas state government has a much stronger revenue need for reopening than California.

That explains why Abbott wants to get rid of capacity limits: packed bars and theaters pay more tax than half empty ones. (Still doesn't explain getting rid of mask rules.)
Washington is not opening up the same way, though.
 

This touches indirectly on something that's been mentioned in some articles for a while.
That the western/rich countries don't just have (as some would agree) a humanitarian duty to help poorer countries vaccinate their population.
But should also pursue this goal with self-serving interest. More virus spread leads to more mutations. And with some likelihood a mutation will develop that will evade vaccines available at the time.
Thus causing new waves of infections also in the richer countries, with the subsequent impact on life.
 
I should clarify. County and city governments in Texas do rely on property tax, but the state government relies on sales tax (and oil tax). Abbott doesn't really care about the counties and cities (heck he seems to enjoy undermining them) but needs sales tax for his own kitty.
In the property tax, the largest amount is for the ISD (school district). A substantial portion of that (according to the ISD) goes to the State rather than to the schools. It's kind of hidden.
 
You literally said "it's the old who vote R". You implied that young people don't.
You need to see the context. This is what I was replying to.

The people who are most at risk or belong to a group that has the most cases/deaths per capita are the ones least likely to vote for Abbott. Because multiple terms are allowed, the job of a politician is to get elected, there are ethical and unethical ways to do this.​

It’s also weird to suggest a political junkie like me would say “nobody young votes for R”. 18-29 is +24 D, compared to 65+ which is +5 R.

5fb54fa2a3dc6100120058f6
 
Not to alarm anyone, but.....

B.1.1.7: Status & Tracking in the U.S.

Bookmark this link:
Helix SARS-CoV-2 Viral Sequencing
Tableau Public

Just a reminder about this Helix link. Florida in the lead, followed by Texas and California. Florida looks to go 50% B.1.1.7 by mid-March.

If you squint, you could probably argue that Florida seems to be struggling to bring down their cases, as compared to other states. B.1.1.7? Maybe.

Texas is a bit harder to gauge due to recent irregularities in the data from the storm.

New York and New Jersey also are showing trends in the wrong direction. (Not sure whether it has anything to do with that local variant there that we don't know much about.)

Places like North Dakota, really hard hit and hitting it hard with the vaccine, are doing very well and are probably past the point of any concern for resurgence (assuming no immune escape).

Just need to keep pumping out that vaccine and getting it into arms.

To put in perspective, we went from 12% of population infected to 25% in 2.5 months in a massive surge. It look a month of explosive growth (from the levels we are currently at) to hit 4% of the population. Future outbreaks will be less explosive due to increased levels of immunity. They could still be massive. But it takes time. We'll vaccinate over 10% of the population in the next month (at least 5x as many people as get infected).

So: Time is (for the most part) on our side. That's what the projections are saying (Path to Herd Immunity - COVID-19 Vaccine Projections) It says that we'll probably double our case level (with lower mortality) from current levels (he's having to adjust his vaccination numbers up so this may be pessimistic). And then we'll be mostly done. Another ~23k deaths from an additional 15 million infections (assuming IFR of 0.15% going forward), not counting deaths from ongoing, current, infections and deaths not yet reported (a much higher total). Bad, but not like what we have been through.

I think the magnitude of that peak is dependent on vaccinations, for the most part, with a small contribution of what restrictions are in place.

And of course the worst-case scenario of rampant immune escape (still no evidence of that happening in vaccinated individuals), with no protection from death from vaccination, is not assumed here.

Good news: vaccines generated for the the South African B.1.351/501Y.V2 variant likely will be quite "backwards compatible." Neutralizing titers from convalescent plasma against the original virus were only reduced a factor of 2.3x relative to the original plasma response. (A 4.1x decline relative to the 501Y.V2 response, the reason for the discrepancy being a stronger response in general to 501Y.V2)

Escape of SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 from neutralization by convalescent plasma

So this suggests that the future vaccine boosters might be able to have a single component, though who knows what they'll decide to actually do.

More discussion:

https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1367085609072939019?s=20
 

Personally I think this article is slightly on the pessimistic side. There's a lot of reason for hope, as Shane Crotty (also quoted in the article) said. It's definitely true that we don't know how the variant situation will play out, and whether we will be able to come up with a vaccine that is broadly effective against whatever variants arise. We don't know how much more the virus will change, and whether those changes will result in more fitness. And we don't know for sure that vaccines that act against those variants will be better overall - there appears to be some evidence that they might be, and might protect against variants in a broad class of variants of concern. Maybe we'll still have a cocktail of mRNA, but who knows.

Definitely it seems like the virus will be circulating for a while, but it's unclear to me at what level, and how much of a concern it will be.

(Side note: It's not clear to me whether the adenovirus-based vaccines can be effectively boosted. I've heard on a couple of occasions now that the immune system might sometimes attack the vector upon boosting, but no idea whether that is actually true. J&J is doing a two-dose trial, so apparently it's not too much of a concern? And the AZ vaccine is boosted and it is adenovirus-based. But maybe this explains the reduced efficacy? Maybe in some people the vector doesn't do as well? Anyway, maybe an immunologist could comment on this.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Jeff N and madodel
Are there any reliable stats on complications from the various Covid vaccines? I've read here and on other places about people feeling sick/having a fever after the second dose of the mRNA vaccines. My neighbors had their second doses a couple of days ago and had zero complications. They're in the 65-75 year old range (and healthy).

PS. I'm not sure why this thread was moved to OT now ... because it certainly will become on-topic in the coming year as the effects of the lockdowns kick in. Government spending can only go so far to cover up the economic fallout of global shutdowns. It sure as hell will affect investing for years to come. There are long-term, radical changes in the basic economic structure. Commercial real estate is basically dead. Almost everyone I know in high level positions (including those in companies with single letter stock tickers) will not be going back to office buildings anytime soon. If they need in-person meetings, they rent a local structure temporarily. Lets call it the "gig real estate" market. This will crush those in the most vulnerable economic classes that depend on all the service jobs required by offices (janitorial, restaurants, deliveries, supplies, etc., etc.) which will then feed upwards. If you've read my posts, you know I'm the last person you'd call a bleeding heart ... but this was imposed on these people by government fiat, not their own actions. And, again, not a bleeding heart here ... but I believe the past year has been the largest transfer of wealth from the poor/middle to the elites in history.
 
Are there any reliable stats on complications from the various Covid vaccines? I've read here and on other places about people feeling sick/having a fever after the second dose of the mRNA vaccines. My neighbors had their second doses a couple of days ago and had zero complications. They're in the 65-75 year old range (and healthy).

Probably better to call reactions than complications.

Pfizer, fever, chills, headache, muscle ache, bone ache, in about 70-80% of people, more common in younger people (below 55). Anecdotally I have heard it is more like half of people with symptoms that rise to the level of “notable.” Seems about right since placebo group had about 40% with symptoms... Much worse after second dose (or first dose with a prior infection):

Reactions and Adverse Events of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine | CDC

Moderna, very similar profile, might be a bit worse, with headache more common, also worse after second dose like Pfizer. Anecdotally, I have heard that people who get Moderna struggle a lot more, often for 2-3 days. It’s not clear that this showed in the trials, though.

Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine | CDC

This will crush those in the most vulnerable economic classes that depend on all the service jobs required by offices (janitorial, restaurants, deliveries, supplies, etc., etc.) which will then feed upwards.

We’ll see. I think there will be a healthy shift to remote work, where possible. I doubt it will be across the board, though. But remember the upside - a lot of companies can now offer remote work as a perk and may be more inclined to hire people to work remotely. Overall, for better or worse, I would guess the improvement in remote work ability is going to lead to a productivity boost. This is good. It’s good to shake things up once in a while. Certainly the people least able to afford it will likely suffer most from the changes, as usual. However, not sure it will be as bad as you say.

We’ll see! Going to be interesting to see what persists and what goes back to normal!