That last one would get worn out here.This showed up in my FB feed--thought it might be apropos here to lighten things up a bit. Hey mods, maybe get some new buttons for the site?
View attachment 248674
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That last one would get worn out here.This showed up in my FB feed--thought it might be apropos here to lighten things up a bit. Hey mods, maybe get some new buttons for the site?
View attachment 248674
TMC is not a board about Tesla the product only, though, it is also about Tesla the company.
What if one, for example, likes the product but dislikes the company? Or any variation in between.
This not a black and white topic IMO. Besides, a balance of voices is to everyone's benefit.
I appreciate the note from @bcsteeve, and yes it was a bit unnecesary, but @JRP3 and I go back long enough that I can take it. Maybe I deserve some of it.
I actually do admit I am negative about many things. Tesla the product is just not one of them, in many ways. The company, the way some things have been handled, yes. OTOH, the drivetrain (outside of some P model limiting ludicrosity) for example is superb, world-changing. And I think Model 3 will succeed, despite personal opinions on its shortcomings.
I do think a lot of us misunderstand each other in the process, though. That's the real shame part. I would like to get along with a lot more people that I do (and I would hope to think others feel similarly about some forum "opponents"), genuinely - however, I would like to do that without sacrificing the ability to debate, at times very hard, tough topics for maximum informational value at the end.
Some people I genuinely like a lot are at times polar opposites of my views and also, IMO, at times I feel mistaken in their information, beliefs and presentation thereof. That is the hard part, how to debate the latter, without changing the former... Often something ends up being taken personally, even when sincerely there is no intention of it being personal. Text is a very difficult medium, no less.
Because when we do debate and discuss the hard parts successfully, many times it also turns out that I was wrong. And that's when I learn too. But most importantly the process, no matter who is right, this peer-review so to speak, filters out the best information we can get. Taking nobody at face value, sufficiently doubting everyone and everything, that may be less good for egos, but great for information. That's what I've been looking for ever since I came here and have found this idea conflicting with many different interests.
I wouldn't prefer a culture where some take offense at being disagreed with or challenged - and yet that's what is happening often times, unfortunately. Some people don't take it well when they or their info is challenged and assume it is personal and basically check out. If only they'd participate in that hashing of the information, they might well be right, but the other party never gets the chance to learn that...
The other alternative that I know is simply to give up on those tough topics and let them - and whatever misinformation and misunderstanding is, on either side - be. Mind you, I'm not saying we need to seek mutual agreement, I am merely talking of mutual understanding and how often that is not even reached before someone gets offended and stops or tangents accordingly.
I'd say giving up is and would be a shame too, though even I do that a lot these days. I'd prefer if we all could just "hack the info" without feeling personal about it, or without fearing the negative either, when it comes to that. But no matter what you may think , even I am conscious of the fact that many do take things personally.
That's IMO where specialist forums are best, hacking the info. But I admit it is not nice for those who come here merely to hang out socially and casually converse topics. That's the equation that I'd like to solve in a manner that suits everyone, because I understand not everyone wants the same things out of forums such as these.
I think the Autonomous Vehicles sub-forum, for instance, is great, because it is populated by many people who are into the same thing. It makes it easier for everyone. But not every sub-forum will be so homogenuous.
Maybe because we have this thread where people can come to complain now?
("I just want to be acknowledged before I can be happy!")
and with that I'm off this thread. It's a great community, right now the energy area is of more interest to me personally but the Automotive area of Tesla is about to execute on changing the world. Honestly it is going to be amazing to watch. And no ding related to any product ...feature is going to have any impact on that transition.
A car with no dashboard, few options, no dealer network....is going to absolutely shake the automotive world to its knees.
I've somehow never seen you posting on environmental news, or powerwalls, or ...well anything outside of cars, you have lots of other cars? Did you join the BMW site and post 5k posts about what a crappy company and product it is? Just curious...Any other forums? Hmmm
You don't actually seem to debate anything. Just spew negative feedback. If you want to debate...discuss whether or not the germans stand a chance in hell of making it through the move of cars to shared mobile computer driven devices. Discuss the failure of all the other companies to have any ..and I mean any..strategic vision re mobility. Tesla is crushing them.
That's why I suspect you are paid very well to ding the things Tesla is actually doing the best.
Mobile technology is a key/core component of tesla vision and no one other than Uber can say the same. Frankly I'm shocked anyone pays any attention when you ding the mobile services features (honestly I did not even know many of the features even existed) on a company that is 6 months from enabling ride sharing via mobile devices.
Like someone complaining about the color of their wing and extolling the features of others buggy whip when the airplane you are dinging is taxing on the runway. Discuss how Tesla could go faster, give insight into...well anything. Otherwise, you fall right into the PR Troll A1. Because I've never seen you actually debate anything that wasn't feature/quality trashing.
Tesla is on the verge of crushing the world of Automotive as we know it. It is going to be an amazing thing to watch. Maybe disastrous for Stuggart and Detroit, we'll see. In the meantime they make a great car that everyone I know who has one would buy another and that is backed up by hard numbers
(was it you who said dont' believe the numbers/data?
implying they should trust someone with 4k negative posts rather than professional experts).
and with that I'm off this thread
I think it can reasonably be considered an ad hominem attack, depending on context. That is against the Terms and Rules.Why isn't the "you are a paid shill" accusation a violation of ToS? It is impossible to defend against and it is defamatory.
In my experience, when I use it the report button is worthless.I think it can reasonably be considered an ad hominem attack, depending on context. That is against the Terms and Rules.
If you feel that you or someone else is attacked, use the report button and state that as the case. The local mod can read the context and try to reach an appropriate action.
FWIW, disrupting the normal course of dialogue is also a violation of the Terms and Rules, and I think some of what has been discussed in this thread talks about thread disruption or monopolization. I think those also can be reported as violations and reasonably moved away dependent on context.
I would guess oktane and AmpedRealtor have other accounts, or they will just make a new one. They probably aren't going to go away that easily.It has seemed unusually pleasant and civilized on TMC the past couple days.
Suggesting that there is some kind of equivalence between positive and negative sentiment is entirely misleading.
There is a reason that we humans do not like to hang around people who are constantly negative. Those people are generally left out of social circles, partly because it is depressing to be around them. On the other hand, people who consistently say positive things are not shunned in the same way. This does not mean that those who are consistently positive cannot have valid criticisms of things that we like, or even completely opposing view points. It just means that persistent negativity is a sign of an unhealthy person.
Speaking for myself, I have severed a number of relationships in my life due to persistent negativity. I get one short window on this earth, and I'm not going to waste it on someone who doesn't know how to smile.
Me too, over the years we have eliminated the people in our lives that are depressingly negative. That does not mean that we do not listen to those view points it just means if you never find something positive to talk about you have a big problem.Suggesting that there is some kind of equivalence between positive and negative sentiment is entirely misleading.
There is a reason that we humans do not like to hang around people who are constantly negative. Those people are generally left out of social circles, partly because it is depressing to be around them. On the other hand, people who consistently say positive things are not shunned in the same way. This does not mean that those who are consistently positive cannot have valid criticisms of things that we like, or even completely opposing view points. It just means that persistent negativity is a sign of an unhealthy person.
Speaking for myself, I have severed a number of relationships in my life due to persistent negativity. I get one short window on this earth, and I'm not going to waste it on someone who doesn't know how to smile.
So negative things are positive to negative people?Fair enough - and this is a helpful post. Thank you for it.
There is another way of looking at it, though. That "negativity" is seen as a positive by those who share similar sentiments. For them only seeing people being "happy happy joy joy" about the stuff they are "negative" about, can IMO be equally jarring - perhaps even more jarring, because there is the sentiment of your concern or feeling sort of being denied by that group...
So, not simple IMO. Some middle ground would seem like the best compromise.