shrspeedblade
Rideshare Monkey
I wonder how long it'll take before someone knocks the lower left corner with their knee hard enough to break it loose.
I will right away with my first heel-and-toe downshift.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder how long it'll take before someone knocks the lower left corner with their knee hard enough to break it loose.
I will use images this time to make my last argument on why I think it’ll be flush.
Knee banging on edge. Lack of leg room.
Yep. From his leg position, if it was a regular dash, he would have been banging on it already! This design is actually roomier and makes it physically possible to fit his legs.In the RCs it appears to be tilted up more, and this guy (who is 6'4" btw) has his seat up so that so that passengers in the back have plenty of legroom.
quote from What it was like inside the Model 3 unveiling event
Model 3 looks simple and clean. BMW has way too many things going on. Excess on excess. Simplicity stands out over everything
Model 3 rids of everything that is unnecessary. Something that every other car maker doesn't do.
I will use images this time to make my last argument on why I think it’ll be flush.
Knee banging on edge. Lack of leg room.
...
It does. I also heard somewhere (I believe Tesla show) that the glove box open button and hazard button are on the ceiling next to rear view mirror so there are no buttons on the dash.Does anybody happen to know if the alpha interior had a traditional glove box? If yes, were there any reports about how big it was?
It is arguable if it also removes some things that are necessary - or we'd be better off having. I am reminded of this fact every time some very simple thing takes tons of look-at-screen clicks on the Model S/X while one of my Germans would have had keep-looking-at-the-road tactile buttton for it.
Nah... clearly the company that created the first long range EV that was also attractive with first large screen display, and then introduced the first highly functional auto pilot is actually a bunch of dumb$#!+ yes men who don't actually discuss and evaluate product design decisions.I some how think it is functional, easy to install, and inexpensive and that was a goal. Think about the MS/X display and the intricate (I assume ) manufacturing that must be done with curves/angles and the trim for the mounting and the expense and time if it must be replaced or worked on. I would like to think a lot of knowledgeable people hashed and rehashed the pros and cons of this and decided the best course of action was to KISS (keep it simple, stupid).
I'm pretty sure people always look when they go for a physical button rather than groping around feeling the buttons to get the right one. If you say that you can hit a button exactly without looking, then you could do the same thing on a touch screen. I always have exactly the same things showing on the touch screen. Most of the stuff I do feels exactly the same on the touch screen. For instance, pressing the buttons to change the temp seems like the same process in my S and my wife's Honda. I glance down as I reach over for the button, tap tap tap up or down and then glance to confirm the temperature I've selected. Some things feel infinitely easier on the touch screen, like zooming and scrolling the map to show the traffic area I need. About the only interface I think is clunky on the S is changing the suspension height, because it involves selecting a particular menu in settings and it's something you need to do reasonably quickly before going out the driveway at a store you've never been to before (that fact that it remembers it from then on is great). How does one change the ride height in a BMW?
Nah... clearly the company that created the first long range EV that was also attractive with first large screen display, and then introduced the first highly functional auto pilot is actually a bunch of dumb$#!+ yes men who don't actually discuss and evaluate product design decisions.
Where the heck do you get that from my post? I was (sarcastically) agreeing with @Ciaopec that I expect Tesla thoroughly debated these design factors and made educated decisions. That does not mean they cannot make a mistake that could impact market. They made some with the X, and admitted so.So basically you are saying Tesla is infallible in your view? Can make no mistake?
Not sure how much thorough debating happens when some important pre-design decisions are made by an involved, highly-opinionated and sometimes right Chief Product Architect and CEO. It would take a lot of courage, and also integrity.Where the heck do you get that from my post? I was (sarcastically) agreeing with @Ciaopec that I expect Tesla thoroughly debated these design factors and made educated decisions. That does not mean they cannot make a mistake that could impact market. They made some with the X, and admitted so.
We also have to agree here that one man's meat is another's poison. You and others may dislike the 3 interior. I and others may like it. Whether it is a mistake or not will be determined by the market... which is much larger than the two of us or the entire forum.
Where the heck do you get that from my post? I was (sarcastically) agreeing with @Ciaopec that I expect Tesla thoroughly debated these design factors and made educated decisions. That does not mean they cannot make a mistake that could impact market. They made some with the X, and admitted so.
clearly the company that created the first long range EV that was also attractive with first large screen display, and then introduced the first highly functional auto pilot is actually a bunch of dumb$#!+ yes men who don't actually discuss and evaluate product design decisions.
You and others may dislike the 3 interior. I and others may like it. Whether it is a mistake or not will be determined by the market... which is much larger than the two of us or the entire forum.
Not sure how much thorough debating happens when some important pre-design decisions are made by an involved, highly-opinionated and sometimes right Chief Product Architect and CEO. It would take a lot of courage, and also integrity.
Robin
The BMW vs M3 pictures remind me of Blackberry vs iPhone circa 2007. I forget, which one did the market ultimately choose?
View attachment 228820
Model 3 looks simple and clean. BMW has way too many things going on. Excess on excess. Simplicity stands out over everything
Model 3 rids of everything that is unnecessary. Something that every other car maker doesn't do.
Agree, BMW has too many things going on, but tesla has NOTHING going on.
Or conversely you could have something that tests way more usable, but is not a market success. Though I am all for usability testing, I think market success is the ultimate scorecard.To me this quote seems to say because Tesla's named successes it must be that they also evaluated the design decisions correctly in this instance.
So that's where I got it.
It depends on what we mean by a mistake. Is worse usability that is still successful business-wise a mistake or not? The only thing that market success determines is the market success and to some extent acceptability. Even bad usability designs can be successful and good usability products fail.
The analysis of usability pros and cons is a much more specific science than merely market acceptance or performance. I guess we'll see over time.