You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am going to make a wild prediction and say he’s buying a lot of Tesla stock soon.
A perfect storm has been set up for offensive market buying by Elon. not happy with the sabotage and unjustly malicious short and media personalities. He’s also stated since the big layoff, severance packages include early vesting. Also, the profitability of 5k is a market milestone, investor confindence moment opportunity here.
Lastly, Elon is making substantial money this year from spacex, with something like 20+ launches. He’s got the funds available to buy into this momentum. With missing his brother Kimbal’s wedding in Spain and having to spend his birthday at the factory, all the more motivation to make like difficult for the shorts.
Spacex is loosing more money than Tesla.
Spacex is loosing more money than Tesla.
she interviewed him (chanos) in february for business insider and then did a few articles (negative of course) about tesla over the coming months.I wonder if Linette Lopez has any connection to Chanos. She has published hit piece after hit piece even as her Tesla sources have been found to be unreliable and get burnt (Martin Tripp)
On Enron:
In the mid-1990s, one of the specific charges I had at the mid-sized fund management company for which I was CIO was the natural resource sector - this included, inter alia, the natural gas and pipeline sector....thus, of course, Enron.
And, as most are even peripherally aware, Enron was big. Really big. One of the largest market-cap stocks of that era, and all because of how it had grown like Topsy.
Now, traditionally, pipelines were pretty boring, fusty stuff. Quasi-utilities; and like utilities the pork chop they hung around their necks in order to attract investors was a good handsome dividend.
Messrs Lay & Skilling, of course, had turned this all upside down. And (as I’ve related once or twice before in these pages) Ken Lay was very earnest, very likeable and....seemingly...very forthright. And every time I heard him talk - in conferences, in small meetings, in the industry breakouts that we still had in those days - I, as well as the rest of Wall St, came away very, very impressed indeed.
And boy, did I get pressure from the firm’s owners. “Why aren’t we in Enron? You need to get us some”, I would hear, quarter after quarter.
But every time I came back from listening to management, and would pore over their books, I simply could not figure out the numbers. They just didn’t add up! So, Enron became for me my albatross. “Everyone else must be smarter than me” - was the uncharacteristic conclusion I used to explain away the discrepancy between my read of the company and everyone else.
Enron itself was, in retrospect, one of the planks I used to sail away from the investment world. I had begun to hate Wall St, although there were far bigger reasons than just not understanding one of the single hottest investment opportunities of that time. But it did gnaw at me.
Slight consolation and satisfaction, then, when once safely ensconced in the heart of the Alaska Range, one year I heard how that house of cards had collapsed. And only then did I learn that the reason I couldn’t make sense our of their numbers was because they were, indeed, nonsense.
Now, Mr Chanos took the same data and applied it differently. Whereas I took them for an indication they were beyond me, he took them for what they were: garbage. So I take issue with Foghat’s wondering if he had any inside scoop. The numbers always all were there for all to see. Most swallowed them hook, line and sinker; I spat them out as indigestible; Chanos grabbed ‘em, stripped the reel of all line, and then turned around and stove in the boat.
This does not mean I regard him as someone to admire. I also don’t think he should be regarded as particularly clever. The article Jesse LnM uses to expose his nastiness suggests that he ‘owns’ the trick of hammering financial organizations by casting doubt. I disagree; I believe that the master of this, in our time, has been George Soros. It is a lot less difficult to break a company - even a monster like Enron or AIG - than it is to break a country. But it was Soros who broke the Bank of England. Now that took wile, smarts, and whale-sized particulars. As with Chanos, Soros claims no active subterfuge - he simply realized the weakness and positioned himself accordingly. But Wall St. thinks differently...and, in this instance, I agree with Wall St.
Gordon Johnson, a solar analyst of Axiom Capital initiated coverage of Solarcity that day with a scathing Sell rating. This seem to set off the "waterfall" of Solarcity's decline. Over the next year, Johnson would publish report after report reiterating his bearish stance. This in itself isn't necessarily incriminating, perhaps he was even right. Since Tesla acquired Solarcity, Chanos moved his short onto TSLA. Curiously, Johnson is now no longer with Axiom and has moved to Vertical group. He is also now no longer a solar analyst and instead "specializes in Basic materials sector", which apparently also includes Tesla.
Spacex is loosing more money than Tesla.
Yes, thanks for finding that. I knew it, but if you do a google for "spacex profitability" you get a lot of articles asking when SpaceX will give a return to its investors. That is, of course, not the same thing. It's a private company so it doesn't have to reveal its financials, but SpaceX and Elon and Gwynne have said many times that the profit is being reinvested.Not true of course.
CNBC speaks to SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell
Shotwell at 1:00: "We are profitable. We've had many years actually of profitability. The years that are financially rough for us are the years where we have had issues [like the launch pad explosion] 2016 and 2015 as well."
Yes, thanks for finding that. I knew it, but if you do a google for "spacex profitability" you get a lot of articles asking when SpaceX will give a return to its investors. That is, of course, not the same thing. It's a private company so it doesn't have to reveal its financials, but SpaceX and Elon and Gwynne have said many times that the profit is being reinvested.
Lori, this is ridiculous. Creating a rocket company has to be one of the dumbest and hardest ways to “make money”. If it was about money, I’d just do another Internet company.
Not true of course.
CNBC speaks to SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell
Shotwell at 1:00: "We are profitable. We've had many years actually of profitability. The years that are financially rough for us are the years where we have had issues [like the launch pad explosion] 2016 and 2015 as well."
The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.
Big oil (Russia, US), big auto (US, Europe), labor unions (US), financial markets? Tesla is very disruptive to the status quo.
Wow, pretty scary stuff. I really, REALLY hope that Elon and the litigation team at Tesla go after this crap. Somehow these strong arm tactics have to be called out.Thank you Jesse! Elon just retweeted this Clean Technica article about this very thread!
A Sinister Cellar Of The TSLA Short Story? | CleanTechnica
Thank you Jesse! Elon just retweeted this Clean Technica article about this very thread!
A Sinister Cellar Of The TSLA Short Story? | CleanTechnica
I listened to the podcast version of the OP and thoroughly enjoyed it.
Elon Musk vs. Short Sellers - Interview with Professional Trader Jesselivenomore (07.04.18) - TechCast Daily
However, one thing that surprised me was that Jesse or Rob Maurer seems unaware of Matt Taibbi !! Have you not heard of the Goldman Sachs being referred to as the Vampire Squid? IMHO, he wrote a financial article with the most memorable first paragraph takedown of a Wall st bank. LOL