If we are into the subject of generalisations, I don't really understand why Americans don't like buttons. Some functions are much better executed with buttons.
Or do you really believe that for example opening the glove box by pressing one button is worse than navigating some screen menus to do so?
Or adjusting the side mirror? Button on the door next to the mirror itself versus navigating through menus on the screen?
Manually locking the car from the inside? Adjusting the electric seat position? Etc etc etc.
Honestly, I understand that "cluttered" interiors are not nice, and that the clean looking 3 interior looks great, at least at first glance until you notice the material quality like that hideous piano black for just one example.
But when it comes to comfortably and quickly executing basic functions, having to use a screen for everything slows down things quite a bit, depending on where in the menu the function you want to execute is buried - plus it is more dangerous because you have to take your eyes off the road for much longer.
And don't get me wrong, I don't see this solely as a problem in the 3, any modern car that relies ever more heavily on screens instead of buttons for the most basic functions is an unneccessary hazard imho.
I keep my 3 reservation of course, plus I have ordered an e-Golf recently, which also has a large center screen for many functions (mostly navigation, entertainment and phone), but it still has buttons for the basics. Imho this interior is a great example how the old and new can be combined into something stylish* and uncluttered, yet still highly functional:
View attachment 318337
*for an economy compact car that is. Of course a premium or luxury vehicle can look more stylish, but at what extra cost? When I compare the Golf interior to that of its competion like the Leaf or the Focus, or even the Ioniq, to my liking it blows all three of them away.