Commentary from November 2, which I identified correctly, related to @schonelucht ’s time frame.
As I said, you offered the Nov 2 comments as a correction to what schonelucht had stated about early 2018. schonelucht's statement was accurate, stating that he was being too generous was inaccurate.
What's more, schonelucht wrote his/her comment in response to one of mine... you then wrote an inaccurate statement about his/her comment in the discussion schonelucht and I were having, changing (inaccurately) the meaning of the discussion. That is why I responded to your comment. I didn't attempt to portray your comment in a negative light, I clarified an inaccuracy (you introduced into a back and forth between me and another member), something that happens here all the time.
Now, I did also add my two cents about how magnifying and repeating things we do not enjoy does not seem to be of use for any of us, but, that was meant to be helpful, not to portray you negatively... I can only tell you how the comment was intended, it's open to you to decide how to receive it.
Last edited: