Guy V
Member
You are off the track again. We need clean vehicles to displace dirty ones. The sooner we get on with that the more we reduce the threat to our continued existence. If someone is motivated to make hydrogen vehicles that do that how dare you get in their way? It is the definition of counterproductive to obstruct useful work from being done.We expanded renewables before EVs. Why would we need FCEVs to expand clean H2? You think fertilizer and steel companies are somehow immune from pressures to 'Go Green'?
Having more solar on my home does nothing to change the fact that exporting less to charge an EV means more CH4 is burned... until.... say it with me.... WE'RE FLOODED WITH CLEAN ENERGY. I could have 10MW on my house. STILL putting 5kWh into my car would mean ~5# of CH4 was burned. until.... WE'RE FLOODED WITH CLEAN ENERGY. You don't pay down the 4% card when you still have debt on the 15% card unless you don't understand numbers.
You won't even buy into more solar for you car. If you are claiming futility of building renewables to offset your electricity use why do you have solar at all? According to your logic the only rational thing you can do to help the situation is to drop dead and stop using any energy.