You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That 1/8 mile is extremely strong. Really good launch on that one but there is still more in that car. It tapers off at the end. That can’t be a fully optimized battery.Some pretty awesome numbers from Reddit tonight. The old M3P did the 60-130 run in 11.4-11.5 seconds. This new one is shaving almost 2 seconds off that time, and seeing consistent 0-60s in the 2.9X ranges without rollout subtracted is impressive.
View attachment 1054057View attachment 1054058
What Soc, battery warmed? Flat terrain? And US version yes?It’s odd because I’m getting 3.2 0-60’s (I weigh 180 btw)
Def need some details and are you using a draggy?It’s odd because I’m getting 3.2 0-60’s (I weigh 180 btw)
I still need my printed slips. These draggys are all LIES i tell ya. /sSo, can we declare a winner of the internet argument with the Dragy data?
Dragy doesn’t lie. Track timing systems do. If you don’t believe me then I submit this track slip as evidence. There is absolutely no way a previous generation Model 3 is trapping at almost 123 mph especially when it is only running 11.17. That just isn’t possible. 120.0 mph is definitely a much more realistic value.I still need my printed slips. These draggys are all LIES i tell ya.
Tell that to the person that insists on printed slips from drag strips.Dragy doesn’t lie. Track timing systems do. If you don’t believe me then I submit this track slip as evidence. There is absolutely no way a previous generation Model 3 is trapping at almost 123 mph especially when it is only running 11.17. That just isn’t possible. 120.0 mph is definitely a much more realistic value.
The timing system was accurate at my track but the trap speed sensors were and still are incredibly inaccurate. Dragy is always consistent when it gets the satellite signals.
I trust Dragy results way more than I trust the tracks.
View attachment 1054190View attachment 1054191
Dragy doesn’t lie. Track timing systems do. If you don’t believe me then I submit this track slip as evidence. There is absolutely no way a previous generation Model 3 is trapping at almost 123 mph especially when it is only running 11.17. That just isn’t possible. 120.0 mph is definitely a much more realistic value.
The timing system was accurate at my track but the trap speed sensors were and still are incredibly inaccurate. Dragy is always consistent when it gets the satellite signals.
I trust Dragy results way more than I trust the tracks.
Maybe to avoid getting into prison after driving at 130mph on the street... ^^I'm curious because I haven't taken my cars to the drag strip since long before dragy's were invented. If track times are inaccurate, why do people (esp some in this forum) insist on going to the track to get their "official" times as stamped proof of quarter mile runs then?
Maybe to avoid getting into prison after driving at 130mph on the street... ^^
Yeah I typed that one too fast and hit post without putting more context. MY FAULT lol For the record, i am not advocating in any way whatsoever for everyone to get dragy and get their quarter mile times on the streets, or drive all the way to Mexico.Maybe to avoid getting into prison after driving at 130mph on the street... ^^
I think it's a stigma that "tried-and-true" drag strips must be more accurate than Dragy's "crazy satellite technology".I meant to say, why do people insist on track times as being more official than dragy.
Are there any drag strips that upgraded their timing systems to be just as good as dragy?I think it's a stigma that "tried-and-true" drag strips must be more accurate than Dragy's "crazy satellite technology".
If only people knew how inaccurate and vulnerable track timing systems are.I think it's a stigma that "tried-and-true" drag strips must be more accurate than Dragy's "crazy satellite technology".
The issue is that track timing systems can move even after they were calibrated. They might be correct one day and then someone hits the wall at 200+ mph and moves it a fraction of a mm.Are there any drag strips that upgraded their timing systems to be just as good as dragy?
I've never seen that before. That's so messed up. I've got to wonder if the track wasn't taking the average speed and took only the speed at the finish.Dragy doesn’t lie. Track timing systems do. If you don’t believe me then I submit this track slip as evidence. There is absolutely no way a previous generation Model 3 is trapping at almost 123 mph especially when it is only running 11.17. That just isn’t possible. 120.0 mph is definitely a much more realistic value.
The timing system was accurate at my track but the trap speed sensors were and still are incredibly inaccurate. Dragy is always consistent when it gets the satellite signals.
I trust Dragy results way more than I trust the tracks.
Why would the official number not be the speed upon crossing the finish line?I've never seen that before. That's so messed up. I've got to wonder if the track wasn't taking the average speed and took only the speed at the finish.
For those that don't know...
"Mile-Per-Hour Timer
Also known as the speed line, this timer is located 66 feet before the finish line. It records the car’s average speed between it and the finish line. This is the mile per hour figure on your time slip."
Drag Racing 101 - Lucas Oil Indianapolis Raceway Park
Burnout BoxThe area just before the starting line that is sprayed down with water, so you can do a quick burnout to warm up the tires or slicks for better… Read More »Drag Racing 101raceirp.com
I don’t know why it is that way, but it is. Little known fact for sure.Why would the official number not be the speed upon crossing the finish line?