mpgxsvcd
Active Member
So what? That just increases the HP. They don't need anywhere near that HP in a Model 3.3 motors.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what? That just increases the HP. They don't need anywhere near that HP in a Model 3.3 motors.
Where is this on the website? I couldn't find a single mention of the tri-motor CyberTruck anywhere on the website.Apparently they went with induction motors this time which might explain the power discrepancy. Now why they did so... I have no idea
View attachment 995343
With the S/X they're doing 670hp and 1020hp off a 98 kWh pack. Realistically if they're doing 1020 from 98kWh, they could probably manage to do 600 from 80 kWh.The 600 HP they get in the AWD trim would still make a great M3P, but like we keep saying, only if it sustains.
The concern here is that they are only doing 600/800 HP off of a 120+ kW pack. We still don't have a lot of data that Tesla is happy to do that level of power off of 80kW packs.
I don't think the website mentions the motor tech just yet. But the "cyberbeast" is clearly listed as being 3 motor.Where is this on the website? I couldn't find a single mention of the tri-motor CyberTruck anywhere on the website.
Some of the older P90D cars had some really strong 0-60 mph times. They should be hitting peak HP by 60 mph. They definitely didn't have the top end speed though. They were trapping barely above my Model 3 Performance. New Model S LR cars are trapping 130+ mph with the 100 kWh batteries.The 600 HP they get in the AWD trim would still make a great M3P, but like we keep saying, only if it sustains.
The concern here is that they are only doing 600/800 HP off of a 120+ kW pack. We still don't have a lot of data that Tesla is happy to do that level of power off of 80kW packs.
It already outputs 602 HP from the 82.1 kWh battery pack in my 2022 Model 3 Performance. It could probably do 660+ HP with the 82.1 kWh battery pack.With the S/X they're doing 670hp and 1020hp off a 98 kWh pack. Realistically if they're doing 1020 from 98kWh, they could probably manage to do 600 from 80 kWh.
I’m not a battery engineer but I imagine there are load and longevity issues to deal with and the size of the battery pack may play into this.The battery pack shouldn't care what vehicle speed you are at.
That isn't a limiting factor of the battery though. It has one single purpose. That is to output electricity to the motors and other electrical devices.I’m not a battery engineer but I imagine there are load and longevity issues to deal with and the size of the battery pack may play into this.
I know the CyberBeast is tri-motor. The CarWow video shows where the tri-motor sign came from. However, I find it odd that Tesla has not even mentioned it is tri-motor publicly. There was just one sign that said it next to a rear motor assembly in the plant.I don't think the website mentions the motor tech just yet. But the "cyberbeast" is clearly listed as being 3 motor.
I don’t think that’s true. Power to weight wise, 600hp and 4,000 lbs with AWD should give you much faster than a 3s 0-60. EV6/5N do a similar 0-60 and they weigh 1000 lbs more. Even a C8 corvette does 0-60 in 3s with 500hp and it doesn’t even have a flat power curve like an EVIt already outputs 602 HP from the 82.1 kWh battery pack in my 2022 Model 3 Performance. It could probably do 660+ HP with the 82.1 kWh battery pack.
View attachment 995532View attachment 995531
You have to remember that this is a single speed transmission and this is HP out of the battery. There are a lot of losses from the battery through the motors and through the fixed gearset. When you talk about losses in an ICE vehicle you are just talking about losses through the transmission. If you took the losses from the gas to the wheels into account it would be something like 55% losses in the ICE vehicle.I don’t think that’s true. Power to weight wise, 600hp and 4,000 lbs with AWD should give you much faster than a 3s 0-60. EV6/5N do a similar 0-60 and they weigh 1000 lbs more. Even a C8 corvette does 0-60 in 3s with 500hp
This is the only car forum I visit that you wouldn't get banned for saying something like that.They don't need anywhere near that HP.
I watched a number of Youtube videos where they walked along the Cybertruck assembly line, and there were signs about both the front and rear motors. For the top of the line Cybertruck "Beast", the signs specifically said that the front motor is a permanent magnet motor of about 300 HP with an electronically lockable differential, and that the rear motors were induction motors with no differential and torque vectoring. I think that's a pretty public mention. It seems that Tesla wanted the revelations to come out through the people who were at the delivery event rather than from Elon or other Tesla folks. It's probably more effective from a publicity standpoint.I know the CyberBeast is tri-motor. The CarWow video shows where the tri-motor sign came from. However, I find it odd that Tesla has not even mentioned it is tri-motor publicly. There was just one sign that said it next to a rear motor assembly in the plant.
Higher pack voltage has been mentioned time and time again as a solution to high speed acceleration in this thread. It is true that back EMF increases with speed and that higher pack voltage could overcome this. As @gearcruncher and others have repeatedly mentioned, different packs may not be in the cards due to the cost. The new S/X is a good example. Same pack for all versions. One of many drawbacks with just raising the voltage is that regen becomes less efficient.
Because of the efficiency lost in boosting the motor voltage to overcome the higher pack voltage during regen.Why?
Except:Because of the efficiency lost in boosting the motor voltage to overcome the higher pack voltage during regen.
I assume everyone here has past at least middle school physics and thus already knows Ohms law and knows that high voltage is more efficient in transmission, yes.Except:
1) Boosting voltage more is not necessarily less efficient, and in fact can be more efficient due to lower currents. If larger voltage deltas were always less efficient, than 150kV transmission lines would not exist.
Elementary, my dear Watson.
By the way, did anyone else notice that Tesla has removed the option to Order a new/custom vehicle on their website? Looks like the only option right now is to buy from existing inventory. Perhaps this is an indication that they are about to officially release the new Highland Model 3 in the US.