Jeremy3292
Active Member
This is the wayMy guess is 2.9s 0-60 (no rollout) and 10.9s 1/4 mile
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the wayMy guess is 2.9s 0-60 (no rollout) and 10.9s 1/4 mile
Not to anyone with a basic knowledge of cars. First, your car had aftermarket wheels (that happen to look like ones that ones could get on a 911), an aftermarket spoiler, and a few other visual queues.If you squint it kinda looks like that 911…
Power to weight ratio isn’t going to get you a 9 second 1/4 mile with a trap above 150s. With those kind of numbers traction and drag are huge factors.Frankly with the right (and achievable IMO) weight to power ratio, they could totally beat the S Plaid.
2.9So what's a realistic 0 to 60 MPH for this car with the existing battery pack and why slap a ludicrous badge on the back if there's not reasonable improvement in acceleration.
Apparently sarcasm is lost on you. And that same basic knowledge is why the Model S Plaid looks badass.Not to anyone with a basic knowledge of cars.
MS has a hatch tho...That's what the MY is for... if you want utility get a MY. If you just want bliss, get a M3P
And still weighs less than the i4 that was being used for the comparisonMS has a hatch tho...
yeah the point is hatch>trunkAnd still weighs less than the i4 that was being used for the comparison
This is “Ludicrous Speed” in the movie.
View attachment 1022315
This is “Plaid” from the movie.
View attachment 1022316
This is a “Ludicrous” badge and not a Plaid badge.
View attachment 1022317
This is 100% stock. It only needs .05 seconds from the current car’s time for them to advertise “2.99 seconds*”.Completely new from what? It's going to be the new hairpin motor or a small revision of it. It only needs to hit 2.99 0-60.
It’s the plaid front motor if those docs are right. not sure why that wasn’t more widely reported, but 5d1 = plaid front motor.Completely new from what? It's going to be the new hairpin motor or a small revision of it. It only needs to hit 2.99 0-60.
What does this have to do with the OP asked. Cant help yourself.And still weighs less than the i4 that was being used for the comparison
Not sure what’s with the hostility. Guess you can’t help yourself either.What does this have to do with the OP asked. Cant help yourself.
Man if this car had a hatch like the i4 it would be such a great car.
In my opinion it's more important that Carwow and Motor Trend report a sub 3 second time using their normal testing routines.This is 100% stock. It only needs .05 seconds from the current car’s time for them to advertise “2.99 seconds*”.
View attachment 1022385
* With 1 foot rollout subtracted.
Agreed. What one guy on the internet can get in perfect conditions doesn’t trump what the majority get with driving the car normally.In my opinion it's more important that Carwow and Motor Trend report a sub 3 second time using their normal testing routines.
If Tesla comes out with a Model 3 Ludicrous Jailbreak 9 second car my only decision will be which Mag7 shares to part with.So what times would shock you? Would it have to run 9s for everyone to be surprised? Would mid 10s be unexpected to everyone?
Completely new from what? It's going to be the new hairpin motor or a small revision of it. It only needs to hit 2.99 0-60.
You can run your own numbers from the cell data. For a manufacturer who has to warranty their battery packs, they don't want to send out a product that's going to bite them in the ass in 5 years.Should be in the 2.5 - 2.7 range, especially if it's indeed equiped with the 5D1 motor. I believe Tesla is looking to make the quickest overall car in each segment.
S Plaid - quickest large sedan
X Plaid - quickest large SUV
3 Ludicrous - quickest mid sized sedan
I also think they plan to make all Plaid/Ludicrous vehicles quicker than all SR/LR variants, so the 3 Ludicrous will likely be quicker than even the S LR.
Is there any evidence that the battery is the limiting factor? I keep hearing this but no one ever supplies a source.