lbowroom
Plaid, white on black, CF, 8/27/21, Track Pack
I’m vain so I went for the larger diameter. I trust MPP will have pads and stainless lines too.Which is a better kit? Unplugged includes pads.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m vain so I went for the larger diameter. I trust MPP will have pads and stainless lines too.Which is a better kit? Unplugged includes pads.
Wheels Size | ||||
Rotor Size (mm) | Front | Rear | OE | Signature |
Stock | 380 | 365 | 19" | 19" |
BBK (Stock +1) | 410 | 390 | 20" | 19" |
BBK (Stock +2) | 432 | 410 | 21" | 20" |
It won't stay that way for very long!MPP is just front rotors - was hoping for a consistent front / rear kit - looks are important too, not just bias![]()
goodIt won't stay that way for very long!
I think I might go with Unplugged and the main reason is because it will the 19" wheels. Also, it offers the biggest weight savings and I might track my car maybe once or twice in a year. If I end up going to 20" I will sell the Unplugged's and go to MPP's. Will you guys change the rear pads too? My understanding is that the compound should match but I am not sure how will that be possible since the offerings are so limited right now.
goodstop piecemealing this stuff! i really like your vane density. Tell us what the package is
sigh! and i thought we come here for answersThere's quite a bit going on!Very excited to partner with @MountainPass on the product dev for the Plaid!
Edit: Follow the MPP Instagram/Twitter/FB if you want to get updates of dev along the way.
I'd just like to try some good quality pads on the OE rotors. This may all come down to pads for a simple daily driver.
Total diam in mm | total area (mm2) | hub (mm2) | rotor surface area | ||
OEM/RacingBrake | 380 | 453645.596 | 202682.8204 | 250963 | mm2 |
Racingbrake | 390 | 477835.839 | 202682.8204 | 275153 | mm2 |
MPP | 400 | 502654.4 | 202682.8204 | 299972 | mm2 |
Racingbrake | 410 | 528101.279 | 202682.8204 | 325418 | mm2 |
Racingbrake w calipers | 432 | 586296.0922 | 202682.8204 | 383613 | mm2 |
Unplugged | 380 | 503546.6116 | 182597.1355 | 320949 | mm2 |
Essex AP racing | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Multiple options keep coming. I am aware that Essex racing is working on an AP set up, but they have not listed it their website yet, but in email they said it would be soon and on the website you can select 2021 and Tesla model S becomes an option but the page is blank.
The unplugged Large sweep package is very interesting. They are 34 mm wide as opposed to 32mm. They do keep the 380mm outer diameter, but the large sweep results in a significant difference as shown below where I have calculated the rotor surface area of all options:
Total diam in mm total area (mm2) hub (mm2) rotor surface area OEM/RacingBrake 380 453645.596 202682.8204 250963mm2 Racingbrake 390 477835.839 202682.8204 275153mm2 MPP 400 502654.4 202682.8204 299972mm2 Racingbrake 410 528101.279 202682.8204 325418mm2 Racingbrake w calipers 432 586296.0922 202682.8204 383613mm2 Unplugged 380 503546.6116 182597.1355 320949mm2 Essex AP racing ? ? ? ?
The unplugged 380mm large sweep rotor is the equivalent of a 408.25mm rotor and has the larger area for the pad to rotor ratio, but allows 19" wheels if needed.
With regards to the above options, PFC and AP racing are by far the largest names in motor sport. These were used by professional race teams across all areas of racing.
Based on this, and definitely leaning to the Unplugged PFC large sweep package, but will wait until the Essex AP options are announced. I assume that they will be offering their Radi-CAL calipers as they offer on the Tesla model 3 package. These are essentially the best in the business and used by all levels of motorsport, but are expensive. I suspect they will be above $6000 for the fronts,
This data is all for Fronts.Fronts only or fronts/rears?
It's not a big deal and I'd take more confident braking any time. Track mode doesn't do anything special about brakes except brake temperature warning becomes useless.Yeah agreed - but realistically if you want road course capable brakes on this car comfort in autopilot mode likely isn't a top priority haha.
That product desire for comfort has to be why the car has the brakes it has (and the expectation that there was going to be a "+" to sell.) When they offer track mode (and accompanying 'track' pads maybe) I'm wondering if they will adjust the modeling for the pad friction co-eff to make it work a bit better. If the 3 is any guide, they won't.
It would 100% suck, because it is not designed for that test. This is the thing, from the article:Understood. Debating pads, front BBK, front/rear BBK.
How would Plaid do on a a Porsche brake torture test?
![]()
Why Porsche Gave the Taycan Enormous Brakes
Porsche's electric sport sedan has regenerative braking, but the car still has huge 16.5-inch rotors and ten-piston calipers up front. It all has to do with Porsche's braking torture test.www.roadandtrack.com
Right I wasn't clear there. I think the proposed idea is to do the opposite - be able to adjust the expected decel parameters for braking when outside of track mode using 'track pack' pads released alongside it that are not as low friction. Again, I don't think they will do this, too much engineering effort for little return when they are working on CT release.It's not a big deal and I'd take more confident braking any time. Track mode doesn't do anything special about brakes except brake temperature warning becomes useless.
It would 100% suck, because it is not designed for that test. This is the thing, from the article:
It seems a little funny given that, in normal daily driving, those giant brakes might almost never be activated, thanks to the car's regen capabilities.
From a product perspective if 90% of the people will not use that capacity, why do it? Their product philosophy is to offer the performance even if almost no-one will use it.
With Tesla's product perspective it makes no sense to meet that test. Which is fine - the few of us that want to make the car work in that context can work with engineering firms and manufacturers and make it happen (I hope!)