Doing a deep dive into the CARB certification gives you some number for range comparison, albeit not real world. Knowing battery sizes you can compare range with efficiency of the drivetrain but not really aerodynamics since this is all done on a dyno. All ranges referenced are UDDS so not real world but apples to apples in terms of testing method. Being dyno based I would assume weight doesn’t have any role in this? Or is the UDDS an actual driving in the real world test? Or is there so,e correction in the dyno testing that accounts for weight and aerodynamics?
ID.4 rwd - 384 (78kWh) - 203 wh/mile
SR Y rwd - 357 (55kWh) - 154 wh/mile
LR Y awd - 446 (78kWh) - 175 wh/mile
LR+ X awd - 508 (100kwh) - 197 wh/mile
MME awd - 295 (68kWh) - 231 wh/mile
MME awd ER - 372 (88kWh) - 237 wh/mile
MME rwd - 335 (68kWh) - 203 wh/mile
MME rwd ER - 435 (88kWh) - 202 wh/mile
Chevy Bolt - 397 (66kWh) - 166 wh/mile
Hyundai Kona - 414 (64kWh) - 155 wh/mile
Jaguar I-Pace - 354.4 (90kWh) - 254 wh/mile
E-tron - 301 (95kWh) - 316 wh/mile
E-tron sportback - 296 (95kWh) - 321 wh/mile
Polestar 2 - 345 (78kWh) - 226 wh/mile
Volvo XC40 P8 - 319 (78kWh) - 245 wh/mile
Files ending in z_e.pdf are zev. Most BEV but some fcev.
ID.4 rwd - 384 (78kWh) - 203 wh/mile
SR Y rwd - 357 (55kWh) - 154 wh/mile
LR Y awd - 446 (78kWh) - 175 wh/mile
LR+ X awd - 508 (100kwh) - 197 wh/mile
MME awd - 295 (68kWh) - 231 wh/mile
MME awd ER - 372 (88kWh) - 237 wh/mile
MME rwd - 335 (68kWh) - 203 wh/mile
MME rwd ER - 435 (88kWh) - 202 wh/mile
Chevy Bolt - 397 (66kWh) - 166 wh/mile
Hyundai Kona - 414 (64kWh) - 155 wh/mile
Jaguar I-Pace - 354.4 (90kWh) - 254 wh/mile
E-tron - 301 (95kWh) - 316 wh/mile
E-tron sportback - 296 (95kWh) - 321 wh/mile
Polestar 2 - 345 (78kWh) - 226 wh/mile
Volvo XC40 P8 - 319 (78kWh) - 245 wh/mile
Files ending in z_e.pdf are zev. Most BEV but some fcev.
Last edited: