Noted, but my criteria was "as quick or quicker" for my list. 2.9 is less quickNissan GT-R is cheaper. You can have one for $103,365. 0-60 in 2.9 seconds
Nissan GT-R Reviews - Nissan GT-R Price, Photos, and Specs - Car and Driver
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Noted, but my criteria was "as quick or quicker" for my list. 2.9 is less quickNissan GT-R is cheaper. You can have one for $103,365. 0-60 in 2.9 seconds
Nissan GT-R Reviews - Nissan GT-R Price, Photos, and Specs - Car and Driver
Overstating it a bit...
I think the upgrade for 20% faster to 155 and 10.9 1/4 mile does require the 90 pack. Because it has updated chemistry that allow a higher discharge rate.
I just ran a quick order through. The BASE P85D price has dropped to $87500 from $97500 which I paid last month. The $10k "upgrade" for ludicrous mode brings the cost back to what I paid. The ludicrous mode upgrade requires a battery pack range upgrade of $3k. So I'm thinking I pay $3K and I'm good to get ludicrous mode.
You use the word "forcing" differently than I do. Similarly for "nothing".If you are not someone who needs the range, then it is essentially for nothing. Forcing P85D buyers, who want the faster acceleration, to also buy a range upgrade that they don't want or need - and one that isn't technically required to achieve that faster acceleration - seems wrong to me. But I know why Tesla is doing it.
When did Tesla promise 2.8 second acceleration with the P85D? I thought it was advertised as 3.2 and Tesla said they were working to make it quicker. They got it down to 3.1 with software but looks like that is the limit.
Not so happy getting creamed by cars on the freeway from 60 -80 MPH in the Bay Area that the P85D should have easily dispatched had it actually lived up to it's hp claims which it doesn't even come close.
Even the 40 was adequate for highway driving (w/r/t performance, range is debatable). Buying higher than a 40 isn't about "getting a highway capable vehicle".The P85D performance is more than adequate for highway driving...as is the 85D, P85, and even 85. If there's an ego issue, some cars will never be able to make up for that.
Thank you! People bought a 3.2 sec car and got a 3.1 second car at no additional cost. Some folks will never be happy.
The P85D performance is more than adequate for highway driving...as is the 85D, P85, and even 85. If there's an ego issue, some cars will never be able to make up for that.
There's no ego issue and the 0-60 is not the part that anyone wants faster. It's the part above 60mph. I will be happy with the P85D when it acts like a 691hp car above 60mph as that's what I thought I was buying.
I've got an appointment to install my new center console 8/4. I asked them if they could do the fuse upgrade at the same time and they said they don't know if they will have the parts, but that they will do it if they can. Fingers crossed.
Thank you! People bought a 3.2 sec car and got a 3.1 second car at no additional cost. Some folks will never be happy.
- - - Updated - - -
The P85D performance is more than adequate for highway driving...as is the 85D, P85, and even 85. If there's an ego issue, some cars will never be able to make up for that.
There's no ego issue and the 0-60 is not the part that anyone wants faster. It's the part above 60mph. I will be happy with the P85D when it acts like a 691hp car above 60mph as that's what I thought I was buying.
It was probably worthwhile asking Tesla or looking here for those performance metrics prior to buying. Only having two gears instead of 6-8 limits the acceleration in the range you are looking for from what I understand.
The 0-60 number from Tesla is using rollout. So the specs is not correct when comparing to example Porsche that list real 0-60 mph times. Both caranddriver and edmunds test both with and without rollout. The P85D is closer to 3.5 sec on 0-60 without rollout.