You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am surprised that the left front is considerably heavier than the right front. Your light weight wheels probably account for 40 pounds less weight. Of course we are all weighting for you to measure the difference between similarly equipped cars with and without pano.
Fiksegts, What options are you getting? Idk if you mentioned them earlier.
No stripped P90D V1 with Ludicrous has ever reported an attempt.
And that's a fact too.
Tesla lying about 10.9 for well over 12 months straight, continuing to lie about it and running the legal risk of getting caught in such a lie?
And the severe legal ramifications associated with that?
Anyone in here is free to believe that, and of course there are those, and will always be those, who believe in conspiracy theories, the tripartite commission, Roswell, Area 51, alien abductions, etc.
However I don't. And I'm simply saying to those who do, well feel free to do so, but don't get upset when I don't believe in conspiracy theories.
as you will see, it will never happen....
What's the claimed accuracy of the scales?my P90DL with pano on the scales...
my P90DL with pano on the scales...
I think that's a logical conclusion which unfortunately leads back to the question of how did MT do it. I don't think we will ever know.Interesting,
You and the 10.8 TRC car are within 100lbs of each other, yes? That would seem to indicate that the pano roof just doesn't provide enough of a weight difference to matter. Something many have speculated in this thread. thank you for taking the time and resources to post this information.
Based on this it seems extremely unlikely that we will see a 450kW car break into the 10's in stock form.
TRC was 4890, so adding the 30 lbs for fiksegts lighter wheels his car would be 4897 lbs. I'm not sure if it's 30 lbs lighter than 19" or 21" wheels. Doesn't seem likely there's only a 7 lb difference between pano/non-pano. That's why I asked about the accuracy of the scales.Interesting,
You and the 10.8 TRC car are within 100lbs of each other, yes? That would seem to indicate that the pano roof just doesn't provide enough of a weight difference to matter. Something many have speculated in this thread. thank you for taking the time and resources to post this information.
Based on this it seems extremely unlikely that we will see a 450kW car break into the 10's in stock form.
They may well have thought they could get all the changes added before they released the p90d but production times slipped and they shipped anyway.It takes a tremendous amount of testing before you can release a high value item with inherent design challenges like a LiPo battery. This is especially true of the item when it has an eight year warranty.
It would not surprise me at all if MT got a car with a development battery that just happened to have double bond wires, inconel spring in the contactor, active fuse and the chassis wired for larger current loads. That development platform surely existed back then given Tesla is shipping it today.
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure it out when MT puts up a number that no one else can touch. Applying all the ICE theory about 1/4 mile times to a BeV to hand wave a ten second run into a car that simply can not do it is not going to make it so.
It's called a ringer folks which simply proves that Tesla knows exactly what they are doing. This was not done by accident.
It takes a tremendous amount of testing before you can release a high value item with inherent design challenges like a LiPo battery. This is especially true of the item when it has an eight year warranty.
It would not surprise me at all if MT got a car with a development battery that just happened to have double bond wires, inconel spring in the contactor, active fuse and the chassis wired for larger current loads. That development platform surely existed back then given Tesla is shipping it today.
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure it out when MT puts up a number that no one else can touch. Applying all the ICE theory about 1/4 mile times to a BeV to hand wave a ten second run into a car that simply can not do it is not going to make it so.
It's called a ringer folks which simply proves that Tesla knows exactly what they are doing. This was not done by accident.
Not only plausible, trc did 10.8 on 500kw. Unless you're calling his car a V3 with 512Kw. But that's a B.S. peak number. The power of his pack is the same as mine, 500KW.A 500kW(V2) car with a few hundred lbs missing would be enough to touch 10.9x. This is certainly plausible.
They may well have thought they could get all the changes added before they released the p90d but production times slipped and they shipped anyway.
What's the claimed accuracy of the scales?
By the new one, do you mean the p100d? I think the new battery pack weighs about 100 lbs more.
They may have thought it wouldn't take much time to get the production line up to speed. You know, the perpetual two more weeks. Things did seem to get added incrementally. They did finally get everything added. It just took a lot longer than they thought.Possible
But that scenario calls for a continuing coverup.
Why continue to state 10.9 all the way up until a few days ago if the above scenario is what happened?
I don't know where the number comes from, but it's been reported that the new pack weighs 45kg more than the old one. It supposedly has 768 more cells in it, so it should weigh more."think" it's 100 pounds more? either way, we'll see....