corduroy
Active Member
I can't believe I just spent $150 on an empty bottle.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Off topic galore
- Thread starter Mengy
- Start date
L
Me too! How do I explain to my wife that I just bought an empty bottle for $150. She would probably be annoyed even if it was full...
woodisgood
Optimustic Pessimist
The easy solution is you should have bought it last time because by now that charge is history.
The bottle is pretty awesome because of the unique lightning bolt shape. I wouldn't have spent $160 on a bottle shaped like a bottle.
Have you considered switching to a new wife who likes Tesla as much as you do?
They aren't even that well made, my tesla logo is printed with a slight tilt on mine (but I still love it)
mltv
Member
If update does not show, click on the click on the detail (not the Open). The update will show
RobDickinson
Active Member
Perhaps there could be an I bought an overpriced bottle thread?
ThisStockGood
Still cruising my Model S 70 2015
Classic fit’n’finish problems from Fremont… I’m waiting for my bottle from the german factory…
pz1975
Active Member
Tell her it was full when you got it.I think my wife is quite relieved it was empty...
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Tesla doesn't need or want a moat: why would you if you're throttleman on an unlimited class offshore power boat?
To flesh out the space-based NN training architecture I envision:
- HW3+ vehicles collect clips of interest for training
- Car visits Supercharger w. Starlink connection
- fleet data uploaded to Skynet
- forwarded via laser burst xmit to orbital DOJO
- space-based training computers use MWs of solar power
- newly-trained NNs downloaded to Earth stations, cars
- repeat on Mars (train those 'digger-bots' NNs in Mars orbit)
- asteroid mining will also have huge training requirements
- Moon-based training center? L2 orbital station?
- need fast data link to NEO asteroids in short-period orbits
The mind wobbles... Bottom line is Elon is JUST getting warmed up. He's gonna be an awesome 80-yr-old.
Cheers!
Last edited:
I wanted to view what September was going to look like in terms of wildfire season here in the United States and found these:
apnews.com
Explosive California wildfires could burn into December
California’s wildfires have already made plenty of news this summer, and the worst may be yet to come.
apnews.com
Tesla doesn't need or want a moat: why would you if you're throttleman on an unlimited class offshore power boat?
To flesh out the space-based NN training architecture I envision:
View attachment 701933
- HW3+ vehicles collect clips of interest for training
- Car visits Supercharger w. Starlink connection
- fleet data uploaded to Skynet
- forwarded via laser burst xmit to orbital DOJO
- space-based training computers use MWs of solar power
- newly-trained NNs downloaded to Earth stations, cars
- repeat on Mars (train those 'digger-bots' NNs in Mars orbit)
- asteroid mining will also have huge training requirements
- Moon-based training center? L2 orbital station?
- need fast data link to NEO asteroids in short-period orbits
The mind wobbles... Bottom line is Elon is JUST getting warmed up. He's gonna be an awesome 80-yr-old.
Cheers!
I wonder if Starship could carry a fleet of Cybertrucks to the moon (Artesis). I feel the race to Mars may be won by China as they already have are exploring the surface.
I believe Elon could move faster if the US would help more. What is wrong with Bezos?
Just the difference between someone who is trying to look after humanity and someone who is trying to look after himself.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Moved this to off topic thread to save the mods the work...
No doubt the law would be in the officer's favor. I really just meant from a common sense perspective, the cop should have moved their car outta the way of speeding traffic. Just like I may have the right of way as a pedestrian crossing the street, but I sure as hell don't assume the car coming my way will obey the law and stop. The law is of little consolation if I'm flattened like a pancake.
In short, both the driver and the officer may have needed better awareness of their surroundings.
Since it's in off topic now:
The car is purposely parked that way to shield the officer, civilian, and civilian's vehicle from traffic. If it were tucked in, the other car (or officer at the driver's window) would be the closest object to traffic.
That's reasonable, thanks. It makes perfect sense to me if the disabled vehicle is already blocking traffic. A bit less sense if the disabled vehicle is already fully in the shoulder since in that scenario it creates an obstacle that didn't otherwise exist, but I get it.
Appreciate the reply.
Appreciate the reply.
Similar threads
