-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Here's a couple images. Given it says "Excluding sales tax" under "Price: $64,100", I'm assuming the monthly amount excludes it as well. So I'm adding tax to that monthly amount. I would LOVE to be wrong. I called the local Tesla and they do not know.
Last edited:
The Bolt has a one year waiting list in Canada. They're not making enough currently, and the ones they are making mostly flow to California to meet their regulatory requirements. Chevy has announced they're increasing Bolt production levels, but who knows when we'll see the results of that.
Well at the risk of getting very "inside baseball". Top of mind Last year's Ontario Fair Housing plan. Its very nuanced so I won't bore people here. Essentially it was pandering to their base, populist and not fair at all, similar to a few other initiatives. You can pm me if you wish to find out more about my feelings on this as it's very off topic now.
Whelp, that simplifies thing. If I want an EV, looks like the current Model 3 package is my only option.
Nah, I don't care that much.
It's only populist though if she comes out and says "I'm providing fair housing so the evil capitalists won't continue taking advantage of you any more! I've got your back! Corporations beware, you're on notice!". I don't think she really ever went down that road, she was just saying she thinks we need affordable housing, and was going to provide.
Basically. The Hyundai Kona EV is the other palatable option, but it's a good 6-9 months out.
Yeah, doesn't do me much good as the sole intention for purchasing now is to get the EV rebate before it's gone. Appreciated, though.
I'm in the industry, what you suggested is what was essentially said. Tenants need protection essentially means someone is exploiting them. The problem was very small and limited but was a good populist policy.Nah, I don't care that much.
It's only populist though if she comes out and says "I'm providing fair housing so the evil capitalists won't continue taking advantage of you any more! I've got your back! Corporations beware, you're on notice!". I don't think she really ever went down that road, she was just saying she thinks we need affordable housing, and was going to provide.
Anyways look at any campaign everyone is looking out for the "middle class" against the rich, the wealthy, the elites, the corporations, industry, unions etc etc... Very hard to breed unity in an election while highlighting differences. Each party had their targets.
Last edited:
wallstguy
Member
Anyone in the Brampton area with a 3 who wouldn't mind letting an X owner do a quick test drive? Really on the fence for ordering the 3 before Douggie cancels the rebate
So apologies if this was already answered here, I tried to search this thread, and couldn't find anything:
For the charger rebate form, it asks you the cost of the charger (line C5), then the incentive claim amount (C6) which is maxed out at $500.
It then asks for the cost of installation (D1) and inspection (D2), with the incentive claim amount in line D3 (maximum $500).
The claims for each of these is supposed to be half of your cost, up to a maximum of $500 each for the charger and its installation/inspection.
BUT, the final calculation on the form is written as:
"Incentive claim amount = C6 x 50% (to a maximum of $500) + D3 x 50% (to a maximum of $500) OR $1000 (or lower if either C3 or D3 are less than $500)."
There are multiple typos in this form (ie. C3 is just the charger model name/number and not even a price), and I don't know how to handle them. Do I just ignore the fact that C6 should ALREADY be half of the cost of the charger (and not that you should take that and half it a second time). Similarly for the installation/inspection: line D3 is already half of the cost of installation/inspection, so why is it asking you to half it again?
Also what is the voltage rating of the Tesla HPWC... I can't seem to find that info anywhere, as it seems to be potentially your choice what voltage you run the charger at? Do you just put the maximum possible even if that's not how it's been installed?
For the charger rebate form, it asks you the cost of the charger (line C5), then the incentive claim amount (C6) which is maxed out at $500.
It then asks for the cost of installation (D1) and inspection (D2), with the incentive claim amount in line D3 (maximum $500).
The claims for each of these is supposed to be half of your cost, up to a maximum of $500 each for the charger and its installation/inspection.
BUT, the final calculation on the form is written as:
"Incentive claim amount = C6 x 50% (to a maximum of $500) + D3 x 50% (to a maximum of $500) OR $1000 (or lower if either C3 or D3 are less than $500)."
There are multiple typos in this form (ie. C3 is just the charger model name/number and not even a price), and I don't know how to handle them. Do I just ignore the fact that C6 should ALREADY be half of the cost of the charger (and not that you should take that and half it a second time). Similarly for the installation/inspection: line D3 is already half of the cost of installation/inspection, so why is it asking you to half it again?
Also what is the voltage rating of the Tesla HPWC... I can't seem to find that info anywhere, as it seems to be potentially your choice what voltage you run the charger at? Do you just put the maximum possible even if that's not how it's been installed?
YusufT
Member
I’m financing the car through Tesla/RBC and not sure what to put for K3 “Dealer or Leasing Company Warrant”. It requires a signature from them ensuring I have permission to apply for the rebate.
The issue is that the Left plays the identity politics card non-stop. Just look at Trudeau and all the gender stuff. It's all about dividing us into groups and highlighting differences. Yugoslavia played identity politics in the 1980's, look how well that worked out.
Nah, I don't care that much.
It's only populist though if she comes out and says "I'm providing fair housing so the evil capitalists won't continue taking advantage of you any more! I've got your back! Corporations beware, you're on notice!". I don't think she really ever went down that road, she was just saying she thinks we need affordable housing, and was going to provide.
She did exactly the "I'm going to stick it to the evil capitalists" move with the rent control.
If the Liberals really wanted to provide affordable housing they would have significantly increased go transit service and cut all the government red tape, costs, taxes, and bureaucracy in order to allow for increased housing supply. That or, cut immigration to allow for the infrastructure to catch up. (but political suicide)
FYI, just checked with the Ministry of Finance to confirm receipt of my application (should have checked the Junk folder first because the confirmation was sitting there!). The very nice and helpful lady (I know and a Government worker even) said that they are now working on applications from April 5th so it could take a while.
5_+JqckQttqck
Active Member
You can leave this empty. You bought the car with RBC's loan. You are the owner of the car until RBC deem you unable to pay for it and sends the collectors for their remaining loan balance.
Blazing Whisper
Member
Looking at the Model 3 configurator right now, Tesla has removed the $14k incentive from their "after savings" math. Looks like Tesla is no longer giving customers hope that it will apply. I'm about to place my order but the risk around the incentive has just been stressing me out.
Attachments
@Blazing Whisper, I still see the rebate in my configurator on my phone. Will check again later.
However, today I can also see the AWD (+LR) option in my configurator. And I'm fuming, because I bet this won't be added to the EHVIP list!
However, today I can also see the AWD (+LR) option in my configurator. And I'm fuming, because I bet this won't be added to the EHVIP list!
Similar threads
