Please go and read my full response as I did refer to Section of the Charter Section 24(1), since you cut and pasted my message. As I touched in my ORIGINAL message on procedural fairness, there are case laws where the government has been challenged on their policies. I did not realize I had to prepare a submission.
We could argue forever on the application of the Charter in this case but I am referring to common law such as was the case Canada (Attorney General) v Mavi, [2011] 2 SCR 504. Regardless, my point is mute since Tesla is asking the court for a judiciary review proves that they obviously feel they have grounds to challenge government on their policy for discrimination. In simple terms, if the government makes decisions that are unfair then the courts have the power to overturn them.
I rest my case!
CanLII - 2009 ONCA 794 (CanLII)
Why don't you two go join the case pro bono. Then you can grab coffee and argue constitutional law afterwards. It's a win-win!