qdeathstar
Completely Serious
Is it really capitalism when the manufacturer sets, controls, and manipulates the pricing?
Yes.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it really capitalism when the manufacturer sets, controls, and manipulates the pricing?
Never? Hyperbole much?I have never seen any other brand of vehicles reduce prices as fast as Tesla has. From 2013 to 2016 Tesla vehicles were doing great on resale but once the Model 3 was released the demand for the S & X greatly decreased and Tesla started slashing prices. Heck when we bought FSD we were guaranteed if we bought early we would be getting the lowest price because after purchase FSD prices would be much higher. That also did not last before Tesla was giving the options away much lower as well.
Are you just going to ignore the big price cuts? When you slash $30k off the MSRP, used prices are going to drop by around $30k. Nearly any Tesla purchased before February 2019 has suffered massive depreciation due to the price cuts. If you compare them to their new MSRP their depreciation might be fine, but compared to what was actually paid for the cars it's horrible. Like worst modern car depreciation ever horrible.
Did you buy a Ford Model T a few years after they came out? This is about the closest comparison based on many factors.I completely agree with "If your primary concern in deciding what car to buy is depreciation you wouldn't buy a new car of ANY brand." and I may resemble that remark!
However
The Tesla price reduction dramatically reduced value to all owners, even if they bought used prior to the reduction. My P100D probably lost 30% of it's value overnight. I have never experienced such dramatic depreciation on a used vehicle.
Yeah! Stupid Tesla! Making more, better and cheaper cars! Stupid company!
Yes there was a market for this price to early adopters, now Tesla has to sell more cars, they know the 3 has cannibalized the S sales, the Raven update was released, they knew they are going to produce a 3 motor higher end version of the S and so they were forced by free market Capitalism to lower their price in order to produce more sales, IMHO.From here it looks like there was never a market for a $130K electric car.
ALL vehicles are subsidized by billions to the oil companies, so there is something to this argument of not having a free market for everything, I look at the EV subsidy as trying to level the playing field with ICE vehicles but in reality if ALL subsidies were removed that affected ALL vehicles then the BEV would be a clear winner financially.These vehicles are subsidized.
I completely agree with "If your primary concern in deciding what car to buy is depreciation you wouldn't buy a new car of ANY brand." and I may resemble that remark!
However
The Tesla price reduction dramatically reduced value to all owners, even if they bought used prior to the reduction. My P100D probably lost 30% of it's value overnight. I have never experienced such dramatic depreciation on a used vehicle.
If your primary concern in deciding what car to buy is depreciation you wouldn't buy a new car of ANY brand.
Uhh... .wut?Some cars / trucks are not that bad.
Paid $48K for a 2017 Jeep Summit.
Ran it for 36 months and 40K miles.
I got $33K in trade. That’s $15K for 36 mo
Amortize $15K over 36 months comes to $414/mo
Amortize the whole Vehicle over 10 years (for the life of the vehicle more or less). And that comes to $400/mo
So I’ve essentially lost nothing. Only paid for what I "used" really. Owning a $48K SUV isn’t free.
Now let's do similar math to OP's case.
I'm guessing his $144K is with taxes, destination etc. and no tax incentives.
So let's round that to just an MSRP of $130K (Model S/X dropped about $20K)
Amortize $130K over 10 year comes to $1083/mo (this is our reference month cost to own for life of vehicle).
Now OP says $70K on Trade in. Well, with Tesla Trades don't include software so a "normal" trade, say a trade on a TayCan might be more like $80K (way overly optimistic I know, but the math is easier, but it would probably be more than Tesla (as sad as that might be) if you can show the value of software )
$130K - $80K = $50K.
Now Amortize $50K over 12 months use comes to $4160 / mo. Yikes.
I guess that's why folks say it's a good idea to lease.
Uhh... .wut?
You bought a $48k Jeep and you think you'll get $48k for it in 10 years? ROFL
Some cars / trucks are not that bad.
Paid $48K for a 2017 Jeep Summit.
Ran it for 36 months and 40K miles.
I got $33K in trade. That’s $15K for 36 mo
Amortize $15K over 36 months comes to $414/mo
Amortize the whole Vehicle over 10 years (for the life of the vehicle more or less). And that comes to $400/mo
So I’ve essentially lost nothing. Only paid for what I "used" really. Owning a $48K SUV isn’t free.
Now let's do similar math to OP's case.
I'm guessing his $144K is with taxes, destination etc. and no tax incentives.
So let's round that to just an MSRP of $130K (Model S/X dropped about $20K)
Amortize $130K over 10 year comes to $1083/mo (this is our reference month cost to own for life of vehicle).
Now OP says $70K on Trade in. Well, with Tesla Trades don't include software so a "normal" trade, say a trade on a TayCan might be more like $80K (way overly optimistic I know, but the math is easier, but it would probably be more than Tesla (as sad as that might be) if you can show the value of software )
$130K - $80K = $50K.
Now Amortize $50K over 12 months use comes to $4160 / mo. Yikes.
I guess that's why folks say it's a good idea to lease.
Ouch. High price AND MCU1. Rough time to buy man. Sorry to hear that.I WISH I LEASED, AND I WISHED THE 144K WAS WITH TAXES, IT'S NOT. BUT I DID GET THE 7500 TAX CREDIT. SEE STICKER ATTACHED
Wait. What about the leasing companies? They are going to be all messed up when they get all those cars back that have lost tons and tons of value! How does this affect Tesla's relationship with the leasing companies? Will they have terrible lease factors when this %$# hits the fan? WTF.
MattWhite I agree with you 100%. Thanks for posting!
I WISH I LEASED, AND I WISHED THE 144K WAS WITH TAXES, IT'S NOT. BUT I DID GET THE 7500 TAX CREDIT. SEE STICKER ATTACHED
Ouch. Doesn't look like it had FSD either.
I must say, I had considered an S/X a year ago, but the prices were so staggering I went with a Model 3 Performance.
A year later, the S/X looked so much more sane price/performance wise and a better vehicle so I swapped (and took some what of a bath on the Model 3 ($10K tops over normal "usage"), but nothing like your hit). In the end it was way cheaper doing what I did (basically waiting a year and playing with a Model 3 with some hit on that).
But those who bought today, may be in the same percentage loss a year from now. But I can't imagine Tesla cutting S/X that much in the next year, but they will likely improve them for similar prices they are selling today. So our values will go down faster than "normal". Only time will tell.
As others said, it was probably the worst time to buy an S/X. Or a 3 for that matter. Not sure if I kept my 3 for 3 years, if that 3 years use would have been significantly more reasonable.