Why would you settle for something that obvious isn't ideal for your usage if you can easily, and affordably fix it? I am not pushing my car hard in the turns on the street. Why would I bias my settings for rear camber for something circuit track based when 99.99% of the time my car won't be on a road course? Tesla setup the camber fairly aggressively biased more toward the track than the street.
Too much negative camber will keep the car tire from being as flat as possible which is necessary for maximum braking and acceleration. So for the street, why run a camber setup that just results in increased rear tire wear, with absolutely no benefit on the street? If Tesla had given adjustable camber to the rear this wouldn't even be a discussion.
I had 19's on my LR and have 21's on my Plaid. There are pluses to both for me. I shouldn't have to be forced to run 19's because of their stupid camber settings or when running 21's burn through rear tires for no real benefit. If 19's were the only way to go, then Tesla shouldn't have even given us an option. If you want to run 19's then do so.
I am for making incremental improvements, even if they may seem minor, as aggregately they can make a real difference. Read the book Atomic Habity to get an idea of what I am talking about. If I improve camber, lighter rotors, make adjustments in wheels/tires, setup toe properly, optimizing inflation pressure, etc. can add up to a real difference. As for braking, I will tend to exercise the accelerative capability far more than the cornering capabiity of the car. I found that even on my LR, I got brake fade doing some of the backroad runs. I got maybe 2-3 good stops from triple digits and they were already overheating. So first on my upgrade list for the Plaid is better brakes that will handle repeated fairly hard braking use while not going with a setup that will only work when the brakes are up to temp. Sort of a street/track balance.