Only if if the brake system is already designed from the factory to reach the absolute maximum stopping power the tires are capable of as fast as possible. Which I doubt it is.
Then you'd be wrong, again.
If the car can engage ABS then MOAR BRAKES don't help. Can't help.
And every car I'm aware of made in the last decade or two can do that with factory brakes.
But no matter. You can theorize all you want and share your internet links. I prefer to rely on my years of experience in racing and testing many different pads on the track.
I bet you prefer the butt dyno to a real one too
The author of the link I gave you that you clearly didn't read has
a lot more racing experience than you do.
Plus literally designs braking systems for a living for major OEMs.
And both teaches SAE master classes on the topic, and writes books on the topic.
He also says you're wrong.
Seriously dude, even the biggest folks who
sell brake upgrades for a living say you're wrong- including Brembo and Stoptech.
If their kits could
actually stop you shorter they'd be
screaming that from the mountains
Instead, Brembo doesn't even bother to measure stopping distance, and they tell you why in their FAQ-
Brembo said:
WHERE CAN I FIND TEST DATA ON STOPPING DISTANCES?
At the speeds that stopping distance is generally measured from (60 to 70mph), the test is primarily testing the tire's grip on the pavement. As delivered from the manufacturer, nearly all vehicles are able to engage the ABS or lock the wheels at these speeds. Therefore, an increase in braking power will do nothing to stop the vehicle in a shorter distance.
For this reason, we do not record stopping distances at this time.
Anyway, back in reality, the brakes do not stop the car. The tires do.
The only way to reduce your normal stopping distance is stickier tires.
See also the porsche guys who drop $10,000 on PCCB kits and don't stop any shorter either.
In fact- Road and Track did a big test on this a while back
The Power to Stop
So, first, they tell you straight up that for a normal single stop-
Car and Driver said:
every car has brakes strong enough for the anti-lock system to hold its tires on the verge of lockup for at least one stop
Which is why brake upgrades don't help there. At all.
Where they do help is fade resistance- the ability to not stop any
longer on the 10th back to back high speed stop than it did on the first.
That's vital on the track, but useless in normal street driving unless you're Jason Bourne.
And second- they actually tested two Porsche 911 Carrera S vehicles...one with stock brakes, and one with the $10,000 PCCB upgrade. Their findings?
Car and Driver said:
The 911 with the PCCB system performed about the same as the other 911 and the Vette. The average stopping distances of the two 911s were within a foot of each other (305 feet), not surprising since both cars were wearing the same tires
A $10,000 brake upgrade, and no improvement in stopping distance.
Because again, the brakes don't stop the car. The tires do.
Again the entire point of a big brake kit is
never to stop the car shorter- and especially not on a normal street panic stop.
It's so that your
tenth stop from 100 mph without giving the brakes time to cool isn't any
longer than the first stop was. (they can also customize the "feel" of the brakes and other things all explained in detail in the original GRM link you didn't read...but twhat they can't do is stop the car any shorter the first time)
THAT is why brake upgrades are useful when tracking a car, but not for normal street driving.