You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Uhh, did you even" read Sean's tweets? It was loaned to him.Uhh, did you even read the article? It was the owner of the car that did this.
...read the article...again...carefully...and follow the Twitter links...Uhh, did you even read the article? It was the owner of the car that did this.
The article repeatedly states that they are the owners.
I wonder why they didn't test their own car, hmmmmmmmmmm.Technically, the article only repeatedly states that they are “Tesla owners”. Just not of the one they tested. . It’s all good.
They don’t own a model 3? Just Tesla owners. As in S or XI wonder why they didn't test their own car, hmmmmmmmmmm.
I suspect the issue of their only getting 66KWh usable is likely attributed in large part to other vehicle overhead.
Ah, you are right. Ignore me... I was thinking it of the overall vampire drain which can be in that ballpark, but that's while the car is not in drive.Nope. The kWh consumed and the consumption rate (wh/mile) includes the energy to move the car and the auxiliary power like AC and heating.
Prediction: Battery is fine. Firmware update will fix (corner case?) issue where car won't charge.
That's why Tesla maintains an "anti-bricking buffer" where the state of charge when the reported range is zero is still safe for the battery.Discharging an EV to 0% can be dangerous. And with not accepting a charge, I guess vampire drain will make it even worse right now.
Driving a rented EV to 0% is like filling a rented gas car with diesel, you just don't do it.
I’ll just leave this here for you."Uhh, did you even" read Sean's tweets? It was loaned to him.
u mad bro?