-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Safety Score
- Thread starter ScottNY
- Start date
FOOLSLFDRVNG
Member
Mattopotamus
Member
I believe AP shows the % change on the main screen, but it doesn't count against the score. For example, you might have a 20% following too close, but because you were on AP It did not impact the safety score.
Mattopotamus
Member
I believe AP shows the % change on the main screen, but it doesn't count against the score. For example, you might have a 20% following too close, but because you were on AP It did not impact the safety score.
Aaf0052
Member
I have a 100 on 451 miles but only six days of driving data.... do I have to go do another drive around the block today before midnight to capture a seventh day?
n.one.one
Info w/o Drama
For those that are using my spreadsheet please see the note I just added regarding whether 9.50 or 9.51 is required to reach 100 on the Tesla app.For those working to get to a score of 100 by the 10.2 release here is a link to my spreadsheet that can assist you in your planning.
There are full instructions on the sheet as shown on the screenshot below the link. Thanks for the nice comments I've gotten from folks who have used this. Who is going to pull a ~500 miler to get to 100? Good luck and safe driving.
Tesla Safety Score - Tracking & Planning v10
Safety Score This is set to read only. To make your own sheet go to the file menu, 'Make a Copy' and open in Google Sheets (not in Excel). No share requests please. There are hidden columns with some of the working formulas so be careful what you change or move. <a href="https://teslamotorsclu...docs.google.com
View attachment 718810
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Don't be so jealous. Just because your ultra cruise isn't going to be available for another 2 years ? And it can't even handle a round-about ?
It’s pretty safe to say that if you encounter another Tesla on the road TODAY, they have a score below probably 98. Anyone else is just sitting at home on their hands watching paint dry.
;-)
disclaimer: said in jest.
;-)
disclaimer: said in jest.
I've been stuck on 97 for a few days. Realizing that only the 100's are getting in this weekend I drove excessively "unsafe" this morning on my commute. I took turns aggressively, used the brakes and tailgated all morning. Damn that felt good!!!
ARTEMIS X
Member
has anyone been granted FSD beta based on their safety score yet? i am averaging 96 but have issues with turning of all things...
My favorite are the people driving extra miles to try and get their score up. I hope you didn't buy a Tesla for the environmental impact reduction. Which means you bought it for how it drove? And now you're allowing a score to limit how you drive? What are you doing people?
Also, this thread is now 88 pages, in under two weeks, all about how to game a score to get software that was supposed to be released in 2017 a few weeks earlier. That has to be a near record- almost nothing else has ever garnered this much discussion, despite other conversations being about actual autonomy, not how to win a lottery.
No. That happens at midnight tonight according to the Technoking.
So, are you assuming if you don't end up with 100 tonight that the Safety Score is done collecting data from your car?
IE - your score is "frozen" at the end of the day today?
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
It's definitely not going to be frozen! But based on what has been said, it sounds like newly minted 100s won't be admitted to the beta if they don't happen by today! So if there's no hope for a 100 today, it probably doesn't really matter too much. It's a rolling 30-day window so worst case maybe you delay qualification (which possibly won't result in admission in any case) for another 30 days. I guess we'll see.
At first it was advertised as 7 days.
Then it was 30 days.
Now it's a rolling 30 day window.
And magically, they're only going to let in a few percent each week with their 1K, then wait for data process, so some people could end up going months like this if they live in an area that the score "obviously" is designed to discount (cities).
Looks a lot like a really broad data collection effort in disguise, with a little "let's get people to drive their cars more and wear them out faster" mixed in for kicks.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Wait - the only thing we have been told is - if the score is 100 today (don't know the time), we get FSD tonight/tomorrow.
Everything else you are guessing ...
Another 40 miles today and 100! Definitely not touching the car at all now.
I don't care if they keep collecting data from my car and assume that they will. I am honestly fine with all the Beta testers hopefully getting the rest of us a finished product soon. Well done earning a 100 to all that have done so!
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
Yesterday, I did some experiments. Not entirely proven I would say - definitely would want to do a few more tests with following events that are incontrovertible - but I think it appears very likely that TACC (when used without accelerator override) masks unsafe following.
Here's the first one. On this trip I had 0.0% following for my score. I used manual driving the whole way, except I turned on TACC (and only TACC) immediately before the Audi crossed my path. So to me it appears very likely that TACC masked this event.
For reference, in the evening, I had a cut-in event which I tried to engage AP for (it refused to engage for whatever reason, slight curve, an overpass, etc.), and this resulted in a 0.8% unsafe following (I can say with 100% certainty that this was the only event which was in the 1-second window on this trip). So this clip gives an idea of what a triggered unsafe following event looks like (mostly linked here to reduce debate about the first clip and whether the car measured the Audi to be more than 1 second in front).
Note that this event lasting less than 1 to 1.5 seconds could have easily led to 60% unsafe following if I had not banked the safe following in the 10 minutes of driving prior (it was about a 20 minute trip). Bank that safe following when not using AP!
Anyway, I had to settle for that being the demerit on yesterday's driving (0.3% for the day, so I banked 300-500 seconds of safe following at other times).
Would be nice to get some other captures with slower passes, where the cut-in is more clearly in the 1-second window for longer, while using TACC. And then we should know for sure, either way. Maybe sometime!
Similar threads
