It's less about what is safe but more about the momentum now. 195 is safe but I'd close them as soon as we hit 173 or something like that.
Do you mean 193?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's less about what is safe but more about the momentum now. 195 is safe but I'd close them as soon as we hit 173 or something like that.
No, I mean 173 because a pull back is technically required. If not now, then next week. Depend on how many DTE your calls have left by then, it may be prudent to just close them once the gap is partially filled.Do you mean 193?
i am also thinking 175 or even 170Don't panic now. Even if we already found the bottom, wave 1 gaps will always, at least partially, filled. So wait for 175 and under to roll or close your CCs.
The reason I think 180 is where the stock should take a breather is because we're at the 0.382 retracement of the last leg down, my favorite target for the first spike from the low. Also blue trend line running from 237. The chart started to look dull right around 179. Can overshoot to 185 or 190 but a pull back has to happen to partially fill the gap.
View attachment 877528
What was the expiry for those?
Minutes rarely diverge from the actual presser which we already know about. If minutes were that important, you would see the market behave quite drastically differently today.My only thought is that FOMC minutes today could spark a huge rally that doesn't see us return to these levels for awhile. (Hopefully never.) Highly doubtful, but possible.
Gap fills actually are deeply rooted in the human psychology. It is unclear if this is the beginning of a new bull run or just a short cover rally. The area between 170 and 173 was never traded from the low. Market needs to know there will be actually buying in that area to support a bull run and the only way to find out is to go back there at some point. If we were in wave 3, it would be different.
I bought another 400 TSLA shares overnight, for the low low price of $293.33, bargain!
The PUTs had expiry of Jan.2023, early assigned just before the stock started rallying today.
Somebody knew something I did not apparently.
A burger stand is not a good analogy since once you've consumed the burger, it's gone. Owning and trading shares have a lasting impact. As such, I'll use the dance floor as an analogy.This never makes any sense to me.
Like, if a burger cost $3 yesterday... then when they opened today it was $4.... and people are BUYING IT AT $4....nobody ever thinks "We have to go back and check if anyone wants one at $3.50"
So why if a stock closed at say 165 yesterday, then opens at 175 today, and people are BUYING at 175 and higher, does anyone need to, or even care, if anybody will buy at 170?
I don't deny gaps fill- I've just never heard a non-voodoo reason why.
Looks like I sold shares at the "bottom" once again.With the SP at $170, so close to my Margin call $165 threshould I sold about 25% of my shares in my margin account at $171. This brings down my margin call threshould from $165 to $138 or so.
as much as I hate missing out when it goes up, I think I would hate being margin called and blowing up my account even more. On the other hand, the margin balance is now small enough that I could ride the stock down to $20/shares if I pump in cash from external lines. (was about $100/share) before.
My market timing is terrible, usually when I sell, it's going to bounce after.. You are all welcome.
Looks like I did sell that 12/16 -210c at a good time on friday though! and on the bright side I'm saving 8.5% interest (and increasing with fed rate hikes) with a 35% smaller margin loan balance.
Does anyone here follow a strict approach to selling weekly covered calls? (Eg, sell 5% or 10% OTM each week, rinse and repeat). Or is it more of a “feel” approach, or something else?
just write with 10% of you maximum possible number of contracts, then it's easy to roll out of trouble, you don't want to be betting the farm now, but you want some income, it's all about risk managementLooking at where we are in the trading channel, I can't bring myself to sell calls. Seems like it would be the equivalent of selling puts at the top of the Hertz run last year. Of course, we could go back to 150 and they would be a great idea, but I'm thinking that is less likely now.
So I'm just sitting on the sidelines, trying to stay of of trouble - still nursing my -245 and -250 puts along.
TA/fibs are not for everyone, but it "elevated my game" and increased my success rate and confidence levelView attachment 877565
But in all seriousness, I think we all have our own approaches and as we share notes we go through phases of trying the same ideas out, and similar trades too, like a hive-mind... which is why everyone's now getting margin-calls
There was a time, a few years back, when Max Pain was pretty reliable, until it wasn't... then there were levels of resistance/support, which worked until they didn't... now we have Fibonacci's from @Yoona and Elliot Waves from @dl003, which are too complicated for my simple brain...
So I tend to mostly rely on gut-feeling, taking into account things like MP, TA, etc., but sentiment can override all that stuff in an instant, and not to forget momentum... then some weeks it pays to be contrary, when people are too bullish, or too bearish, do the opposite, that can pay off
Most of all, don't bet the farm, write strikes you can live with if exercised early, avoid leverage and margin - then you're golden