I know I've said this before, but I think we've got "safe" and "risky" reversed on this forum. To me, risking 2.2M to make 100k (or whatever your actual max profit was) is extremely risky, and would keep me up at night too. Anything "real" happening like Elon dying, China invading Taiwan, etc. is likely to plow through even a 99% chance BPS. And it would take 22 weeks of profit to build up a cash wall against a single black swan event.
I'd rather have a reasonable plan for what the SP is going to do using the excellent information on this board, and place trades that risk 400k to earn 100k, and leave 1.8M in cash or in naked puts, which also don't bother me. That way so long as there isn't a black swan once a month, I should be ok. My ICs should be similar; I'm looking for something that earns about 20% so that I can build up cash reserves and don't get wiped out by rare events.
This whole tweet thing only impacted my portfolio by about -100k using approximately the above strategy, so it's closer to risking 100k for 100k, since I could have in theory exited those positions for 100k loss after an 80 point drop this morning. I'm back up to basically even with where I was on Friday now, after selling BPS into the dip. But if it had been a something-burger, I can take a max loss on those trades, roll a few naked puts for a while and sleep just fine.
Anyway, not criticism or advice, just wanted to share my perspective.