croman
Well-Known Member
We can also count on the lawyers to get us what we bought if Tesla fails to deliver on the FSD dream bought by many!
Too soon for that class action, however I think an EAP CA is loooooong overdue and no $288 doesn't cover it, because
they still have not delivered 1 EAP feature 1.5 years later!
Yea, paltry sum. Class actions are useless because only class counsel gets $$$. We just get scraps. I think, though, that Tesla is very vulnerable on EAP to individual consumer fraud actions in certain states. The issue is, even for me, its not worth the time to go after them. Especially if they actually start rolling it out. In IL I have a 3 year Statute of Limitations and I've been biding my time but if Tesla does deliver it, I'm really not inclined to fight. I'll take the $288 and enjoy my EAP. I'm not happy but I'm also not going to waste my $350/hr on a $5k feature (though I could probably draft the complaint and e-file it in 3-4 hours, I bet Tesla doesn't even fight it, it still isn't worth my time to go to the 2 hearings and prove up).
And as time passes, I probably will turn my attention to FSD but if they actually start on that in August, yes it will be 2 years late, but again, not worth my time over a $3k expense.
This is how corporations, along with mandatory arbitration, still walk over consumers and get away with it. Now SCOTUS says you can't even have class action arbs anymore, so individuals have to split an $800/hr arb fee to get some measure of justice? What a joke.
I think once the Baby Boomers go maybe the nation can figure out a 21st century path instead of being mired in the 20th century garbage.
Back to the regularly scheduled "you're holding it wrong" discussion.