Looks like regen is increasing! Wonder if it is only for Model 3's though.
https://i.redd.it/j7kiruumncu11.jpg
https://i.redd.it/j7kiruumncu11.jpg
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like regen is increasing! Wonder if it is only for Model 3's though.
https://i.redd.it/j7kiruumncu11.jpg
I wonder the same thing. I would seem that any features tied to NAV or that involve only the front main camera (i.e., most interstate highway driving) could be implemented. This would include what you suggest, plus things like slowing on exit ramps. Any maybe one day they will address the hill cresting issue.I was wondering if it's technically possible to implement a "drive on Nav" feature for AP1 cars that's essentially equivalent to what AP2/AP2.5 cars can do with 2018.42.x (according to the Electrek article), where the car plans your lane changes for you, but you have to initiate the actual lane change. It seems that it just would need the path planning and display parts of this feature, which shouldn't be too different on AP1 than on AP2/AP2.5. This would have the benefit of improved lane guidance on the IC, over what AP1 users currently get.
Bruce.
Yes, you get that if you put it in the wrong slot...Don’t even get me started about everything wrong with Horse Media Player.... it keeps corrupting my USB sticks.
I love the regen and would gladly welcome more of it, however I don't expect this to carry over to the MS/MX. They've been at the same regen level for years.Looks like regen is increasing! Wonder if it is only for Model 3's though.
https://i.redd.it/j7kiruumncu11.jpg
It's been said before, but I wish Tesla had a much more open development environment. I don't need code and emulators (would be nice, though), but something a little more like iRobot's approach to Roomba hacking would be good. (And no, nobody needs to point out how robot vacuums and cars are different.)That "hacker guy" is @wk057 and yes but he's more than a software hacker. But v9 is doing a lot more than you seem to appreciate but we know your agenda doesn't allow you to be objective.
I wonder the same thing. I would seem that any features tied to NAV or that involve only the front main camera (i.e., most interstate highway driving) could be implemented. This would include what you suggest, plus things like slowing on exit ramps. Any maybe one day they will address the hill cresting issue.
But my fear is that the further the AP1 and AP2 code bases diverge, the less likely it is that these updates will follow in lockstep.
I was wondering if it's technically possible to implement a "drive on Nav" feature for AP1 cars that's essentially equivalent to what AP2/AP2.5 cars can do with 2018.42.x (according to the Electrek article), where the car plans your lane changes for you, but you have to initiate the actual lane change. It seems that it just would need the path planning and display parts of this feature, which shouldn't be too different on AP1 than on AP2/AP2.5. This would have the benefit of improved lane guidance on the IC, over what AP1 users currently get.
Bruce.
You can very easily. What AP2 V9 is doing is very simplistic.
Didn't that hacker guy do something similar with the ultrasonics?
What you guys keep forgetting is that AP1 cars do not have the higher precision GPS that the AP2 cars received, in order to definitively know which lane you are in. Also, AP1 cars do not have the wide angle camera to be able to identify precisely which lane you are in. Nor do we have the rear facing cameras to cross reference with to determine exactly which lane we are in. In summary, AP1 doesn't know which lane you are in. So, it would be just as it is now; where it displays on the IC which lane it suggests for you to be in, because it doesn't know if you are already in that lane or not.I wonder the same thing. I would seem that any features tied to NAV or that involve only the front main camera (i.e., most interstate highway driving) could be implemented. This would include what you suggest, plus things like slowing on exit ramps. Any maybe one day they will address the hill cresting issue.
But my fear is that the further the AP1 and AP2 code bases diverge, the less likely it is that these updates will follow in lockstep.
I don’t have gps but I know what lane I am in. I can do it by looking out of the window, mich like the camera does. I would be really worried if it relies on gps to know the lane it’s in!What you guys keep forgetting is that AP1 cars do not have the higher precision GPS that the AP2 cars received, in order to definitively know which lane you are in. Also, AP1 cars do not have the wide angle camera to be able to identify precisely which lane you are in. Nor do we have the rear facing cameras to cross reference with to determine exactly which lane we are in. In summary, AP1 doesn't know which lane you are in. So, it would be just as it is now; where it displays on the IC which lane it suggests for you to be in, because it doesn't know if you are already in that lane or not.
I want to dream big too, but I don't want my dreams so big, as to always be disappointed due to reality.
Clearly you only read one sentence....I don’t have gps but I know what lane I am in. I can do it by looking out of the window, mich like the camera does. I would be really worried if it relies on gps to know the lane it’s in!
The issue is: removing functionality that was a selling point when purchasing a $150k car.
hmmm, I don't think so. It works in all of my v9 releases. Have you seen a couple of the other threads discussing how to do it?Quick question while talking about features being removed in case I’ve missed other posts... did they silently remove the ability to play music from a usb drive? Haven’t seen it on any of the v9 releases so far in my car.
Is that a typo, an exaggeration, or a real price you paid? I am confused. I got the X100 with most of the options, tax, license, registration, etc. and it was at least $25,000 less. What costs 150k?
Not disputing your point, just the sticker shock that got my attention.
2015 Model S P90DL, fully loaded (minus rear facing seats, and cold weather pkg), $142k plus 7.5% tax, came to ~$!52k.Is that a typo, an exaggeration, or a real price you paid? I am confused. I got the X100 with most of the options, tax, license, registration, etc. and it was at least $25,000 less. What costs 150k?
Not disputing your point, just the sticker shock that got my attention.
Welllll..... that was the total amount of money Tesla asked me to give them before they would give me the car, soooo, I kinda figure that is the price of the car, no?Counting tax is a little hyperbolic. Why not also count income tax and then the car is $300k+ “earned dollars”
No, that’s money Tesla has to collect on behalf of the state you live in for benefits that the state provides. And most of the markup on the P and Ludicrous models have nothing to do with the touchscreen and all the more to do with the performance of the drivetrain.... if they pushed an update that made Ludicrous mode slow down to a base model, I would see things more your way.Welllll..... that was the total amount of money Tesla asked me to give them before they would give me the car, soooo, I kinda figure that is the price of the car, no?