N13MS
Member
Last edited:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hum... wondering if by some miracle this will be done in two weeks? LOL
Maybe, but you'd think that an expansion of this location would be a while down the road. I mean, it isn't even built yet. Also, these are 72 kW urban style Superchargers, so not sure if those will ever get an upgrade. By using urban style, Tesla is saying that this location is meant for local charging, not fast charging for freeway travelers.
I am not sure that is entirely correct. Urban chargers offer the ability to guarantee a reasonably fast rate of charge when paired, even if not as fast as the standard "classic" style. To me, it seems that the target would not necessarily be for local charging, but for crowded charging. Now, perhaps the need for locals to charge makes a site crowded, but that is not necessarily the point and the subject of a different discussion.By using urban style, Tesla is saying that this location is meant for local charging, not fast charging for freeway travelers.
Now, that brings me to a question, as I have never used an Urban-style charger: Given that If I start off typically at 112 or so, and rapidly taper down as my charge increases, would I, at an urban charger, maintain the 72 kw rate for a longer time before the taper begins? That would make sense.
What an odd layout for these beams. Seems so random. Keep posting photos.
My working theory is that the construction guys are just trolling everyone in this thread to get back at you for the fire hydrant conduit debacle.It’s Teslahenge.
Bruce.
My working theory is that the construction guys are just trolling everyone in this thread to get back at you for the fire hydrant conduit debacle.
I found something similar on line. Maybe this is what they have in mind?Best theory so far! Come on, anyone else have a guess?