You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish that Porsche would have made an electric 911. That would have been a statement about the future.
I wish that Porsche would have made an electric 911. That would have been a statement about the future.
I like the Panbanana because it's available in wagon formI agree that the Panabanana body doesn't do much for most of us, and the 911 shape is more appealing, but not sure what an electric 911 would even look like? Rear motor only? Sitting behind the drive wheels even? Porsche made that configuration finally (mostly) safe after decades of trailing throttle oversteer, but wouldn't it make sense to start with a clean sheet of paper, the way Tesla did, and with more mid-mounted motor(s)?
it is going to come in at something like 4700 pounds.
(large luxury car vs. mid-size sports sedan).
The market for large luxury cars that aren't CUVs shrinks every year.
I guess the Model X is minivan with less functional doors but it's still better than a minivan with regular doors (which is what large CUVs are). They should just put minivan doors on the Model X and call it a day . At least then it would be a more functional abomination.They should make a CUV version of the S. They need to dump that X; it is an abomination.
I didn't realize it's that huge. Anyway, I still think it would be silly to make the Model S a Taycan competitor. Tesla should focus their development efforts on CUVs.I agree one is a luxury car and the other is a sports sedan. But they are 195/196 inches in length, and both 77 inches in width (who knows whether this includes mirrors, but the point is they are quite similar in size).
Actually, that will probably happen in less than a year (~480 cycle 1 EA sites, plus ~180 Porsche dealerships with 350kW CCS chargers).2) Charging/Charging Network – also no competition and although on paper it may have some advantages with being able to charge at 270 kW, how many places can you actually get that level of charging? And how long will it take before Porsche and Audi have even 500 of these high-level chargers available in the United States? At least several years.
And when will Tesla have even 500 of these v3 chargers?The Model 3 will be able to charge at 250 kW on version 3 superchargers, and it looks like it's a draw on charging speed there, even if the Taycan has some theoretical advantages on the Model S. However the wide availability of superchargers means that Tesla realistically wins on this point too.
The Taycan will easily compensate this through its much more elaborate suspension and features such as anti-roll bar and rear-wheel steering, as well as vastly superior performance compared to the Model 3 (you're talking about a 600+ hp car). Don't kid yourself. The Model 3 Performance is a great value, but it isn't in the same league as the Taycan Turbo/Turbo S (and obviously you pay for that). Perhaps it'll be closer to the future entry-class Taycans.3) Handling/Trackability/Performance – still not clear what this is going to drive like but it is going to come in at something like 4700 pounds. I suspect it will be a way better driver's car than the Model S, but it's still unlikely to feel as light on its feet as the Model 3 DMP.
They should just put minivan doors on the Model X and call it a day
No one else use 800V battery than Porsche. Considering the crazy price point and low production amount (20k a year global). I really doubt anyone would bother installing 800V chargers other than porsche dealers.Actually, that will probably happen in less than a year (~480 cycle 1 EA sites, plus ~180 Porsche dealerships with 350kW CCS chargers).
And when will Tesla have even 500 of these v3 chargers?
The Taycan will easily compensate this through its much more elaborate suspension and features such as anti-roll bar and rear-wheel steering, as well as vastly superior performance compared to the Model 3 (you're talking about a 600+ hp car). Don't kid yourself. The Model 3 Performance is a great value, but it isn't in the same league as the Taycan Turbo/Turbo S (and obviously you pay for that). Perhaps it'll be closer to the future entry-class Taycans.
You are misinformed. 800V (actually up to 1000V) charging is part of the CCS standard. All CCS chargers with more than 250kW power support 800V charging. And EA has one or two 350kW chargers at almost all of their sites.No one else use 800V battery than Porsche. Considering the crazy price point and low production amount (20k a year global). I really doubt anyone would bother installing 800V chargers other than porsche dealers.
The Taycan charges up to 150kW at 400V.If you use 400V EA chargers, then you only have 135kw charging (half of the claimed 270kw).
The Taycan charges up to 150kW at 400V.
When I checked yesterday it was only $460. Does it really matter on a $150k+ car?If you pay $600 for that option. Otherwise, only 50kW for the plebes.
When I checked yesterday it was only $460
This is odd. The Model 3P is faster around a track than the Model S. Maybe they've got a new special edition Model S?
This is odd. The Model 3P is faster around a track than the Model S. Maybe they've got a new special edition Model S?